MHB Word Problem: Application Of Linear Equations (Typo In Textbook?)

NotaMathPerson
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Is there a difference between the following statement

"The number of dimes is 5 times more than twice the number of nickels" and "The number of dimes is 5 more than twice number of nickels"?

The 5 times more... and the 5 more than... confuses me. Please clarify this for me. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Word problem

NotaMathPerson said:
"The number of dimes is 5 times more than twice the number of nickels"

d = 5 * 2n

NotaMathPerson said:
"The number of dimes is 5 more than twice number of nickels"

d = 2n + 5
 
Re: Word problem

greg1313 said:
d = 5 * 2n
d = 2n + 5

Hello the orginal problem where I get that statement from is this

The soda machine contains $3.00 in nickels and dimes. If the number of dimes is 5 times more than twice the number of nickels, how manay coins of each type are there?

When I used d=5*2n, I get a decimal number. But when I use d = 5+2n I get an exact answer. Do yout think the problem has typo error?
 
Re: Word problem

It certainly appears that way. My results are the same as the results you described.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Back
Top