- 20,648
- 27,829
If it wasn't mathematical nonsense, I'd say: "Once again an example of how dense English is in the set of all possible words."kuruman said:Could also be an elementary particle.
If it wasn't mathematical nonsense, I'd say: "Once again an example of how dense English is in the set of all possible words."kuruman said:Could also be an elementary particle.
kuruman said:Could also be an elementary particle.
Orodruin said:One of those 3-guess days I guess![]()
Another victim of ”hard mode makes a good guess a bad guess” …Mister T said:Wordle 976 X/6*
![]()
See, this is what you cannot do in ”hard mode” and resulted in this death sentence:gmax137 said:info gathering
Mister T said:![]()
In the end, it is a matter of someone's specific personal risk aversion function. E.g. I value the experience of a lost attempt (damn, I could have gotten it in less) as more negative than a lost attempt by risking it.Orodruin said:See, this is what you cannot do in ”hard mode” and reaulted in this death sentence:
That’s fine. My beef with ”hard mode” is that it removes the choice. You cannot make the choice of risking it or not. In particular when you happen to make what should a priori be a good guess it can actually lock you into a situation where you cannot guarantee solving it even if you have 4 correct letters early on. That is what is absurd about the hard mode rules in my mind. Getting 4 correct on the opening guess should be a ”Great!”, not an ”oh crap!”fresh_42 said:In the end, it is a matter of someone's specific personal risk aversion function. E.g. I value the experience of a lost attempt (damn, I could have gotten it in less) as more negative than a lost attempt by risking it.
There is no one strategy fits all, since everybody has a different risk aversion function ##\mu(\sigma ).##
BLIMP would have been guaranteed to narrow it down to at most two CATCH/WATCH. All others would have been resolved.gmax137 said:BALMY which I know is wrong, but...it leaves only one of those six choices.