Work: an object falls onto a spring. Find max. dist. the spring is compressed.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A block of mass 2.4 kg is dropped from a height of 0.59 m onto a spring with a spring constant of 1240 N/m. The maximum distance the spring is compressed is calculated to be 0.170 m. The initial approach using work-energy principles was flawed due to incorrect height consideration. The correct method involves applying conservation of energy, leading to the equation mg(h+x) = 1/2 kx², which is a quadratic equation in x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as mass, height, and spring constant.
  • Familiarity with work-energy principles in physics.
  • Knowledge of quadratic equations and their solutions.
  • Basic understanding of conservation of energy in mechanical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy principle in mechanical systems.
  • Learn how to solve quadratic equations effectively.
  • Explore the relationship between potential energy and spring compression.
  • Review the work-energy theorem and its applications in physics problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation and spring dynamics in real-world applications.

DavidAp
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Until I learn to walk my name might pop up a lot in this thread...

A block of mass m = 2.4 kg is dropped from height h = 59 cm onto a spring of spring constant k = 1240 N/m. Find the maximum distance the spring is compressed.

Answer: 0.170m


The first thing I did was convert the height from centimeters to meters so that all the units could work nicely together giving me 0.59 m.

Then I found Work using mgrCos(theta).
W = mgrCos(theta)
W = 2.4 kg(9.8 m/(s^2))(0.59 m)Cos(0)
W = 13.8768 J

After I played around with a more general equation of Work.
W = ΔK + ΔU
W = Kf - Ki + Uf - Ui

However, since the spring is in equilibrium before the block falls on it, conceptually, I saw that the Ui should equal to zero so my equation is,
W = Kf - Ki +Uf

And we know that Ki = 1240 N/m so,
W = Kf - 1240 N/m + Uf
W = 1/2m(v^2) - 1240 N/m + mgy

13.8768 J = 1/2(2.4 kg)(Vf^2) - 1240 N/m + 2.4 kg(9.8 m/(s^2))(y)
Now, I wrote Vf because it's an unknown and though I think there is a way to solve it using Work I went on to use a kinematic equation because I'm still very new to Work and have not yet learned how to do that.
Vf^2 = Vi^2 +2aΔy
Vf^2 = 9.8 m/(s^2)(0.59 m)
Vf^2 = 11.564 m/s

Back to my equation,
13.8768 J = 1/2(2.4 kg)(11.564 m/2) - 1240 N/m + 23.52 N(y)
13.8768 J = 13.8768 J - 1240 N/m + 23.52 N(y)
0 = -1240 N/m + 23.52 N(y)
1240 N/m = 23.52 N(y)
52.72 /m = y
_______________________________________________
As you can see something went horribly wrong! I'm new to Work but I felt pretty confident approaching this problem until I got to the end. Not only is my answer numerically incorrect but the units seem impossible; nothing over meters?

Can somebody help show me what I did wrong with this question? I'm sorry if it was difficult to follow, mathematics on text always seems like a puzzle to me.

Thank you for taking the time to review my question, I greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think u r wrong at taking the height that the object falls as 0.59m. actually the height should be 0.59 +x, where x is the compression of the spring. at that point there is no KE. so, the relevant eqn. should be (from conservation of energy),
mg(h+x) = 1/2 kx2.
this is a quadratic eqn. in x. now solve for x, if u know how to solve a quadratic eqn.
 
bjd40@hotmail.com said:
i think u r wrong at taking the height that the object falls as 0.59m. actually the height should be 0.59 +x, where x is the compression of the spring. at that point there is no KE. so, the relevant eqn. should be (from conservation of energy),
mg(h+x) = 1/2 kx2.
this is a quadratic eqn. in x. now solve for x, if u know how to solve a quadratic eqn.
Thank you, you are absolutely right! The math is so much shorter this way too!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K