Work and Energy Theorem- change in acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a toy car colliding with a spring, where the car's mass and initial speed are given, along with a variable acceleration as it comes to rest. The objective is to determine the spring constant using the work-energy theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the work-energy equation and express confusion regarding the role of acceleration in the problem. Some participants question the correctness of the kinetic energy term used in the equation and whether acceleration should be included in the calculations. Others explore the implications of having two unknowns and suggest relationships between force, mass, and acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing insights and corrections regarding the equations used. There is no clear consensus on how to incorporate acceleration into the solution, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of friction and the conservative nature of the work involved. There is also mention of the variable acceleration and how it complicates the application of the work-energy theorem.

JhonnyO
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A toy car of mass 555g is moving with speed 1.21m/s and strikes a spring mounted to the wall. The spring slows the toy car to rest with a acceleration that varies from 0 - 3.055m/s2.
Determine the spring constant.

Homework Equations


W = -1/2mv2 + 1/2 kx2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've seen equations like this but I don't understand the acceleration part. I think that because there is no friction the work is conservative so it equals zero. Then I solved the equation for x2 and substituted that back into the equation so that I could solve for k but the answer I got doesn't jive with the one my instructor gave me. What am I doing wrong?Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
W = -1/2mva + 1/2 kx2
It should be W = -1/2mva^2 + 1/2 kx2
 
Why is the acceleration part of the kinematic equation? And if there is a range (0-3.055) then what number should I insert?

Otherwise was the way I was going about solving it right?

Thanks
 
For kinetic energy you have used 1/2* m *va. It should be 1/2* m *va^2. Is it typo?
 
oh yea, sorry but the acceleration should be included?
 
No. a is not a part of the equation. I think there is some confusion in your notation, since I trust you didn't intend that a was a subscript of v.

KE = 1/2*m*v2
 
my question is still how does the acceleration factor into this problem? I'm trying to work the problem out and I'm not getting the question right I don't understand what I am doing wrong.

am I using the right formula?
 
You have 2 equations and 2 unknowns don't you?

You don't know k or x.

But they tell you that max a = 3.055 which means that

Fmax = .555*3.055

which is also

Fmax = k*x

You also know that

1/2*m*v2 = 1/2*k*x2

So Xmax = m*v2/Fmax

and k = Fmax/Xmax
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K