Which Gas Compression Process Requires the Most Work?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the work required to compress an ideal gas to half its initial volume through different processes: isothermal, adiabatic, and isobaric. It concludes that adiabatic compression requires the most work due to the increase in internal energy and temperature of the gas, as energy cannot escape during the process. In contrast, isothermal compression allows energy to be removed, resulting in less work. The comparison between adiabatic and isobaric processes indicates that adiabatic compression also requires more work than isobaric compression, as the latter involves a drop in internal energy to maintain constant pressure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ideal gas behavior
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic processes: isothermal, adiabatic, and isobaric
  • Familiarity with concepts of internal energy and temperature
  • Basic principles of work done in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the First Law of Thermodynamics and its application to gas processes
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of work done in isothermal and adiabatic processes
  • Investigate real-world applications of adiabatic and isothermal compression in engineering
  • Explore the concept of heat transfer in thermodynamic processes
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of gas compression and energy transfer in various processes.

Ghost Repeater
Messages
32
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



This is a conceptual question.

An ideal gas is compressed to half its initial volume by means of several possible processes. Which of the following processes results in the most work done on the gas? a) isothermal b) adiabatic c) isobaric d) The work done is independent of the process.

2. Homework Equations

I'm deliberately trying to avoid using equations. I'm trying to reason it out 'physically' rather than 'algebraically' using formulas.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
As I said, I'm trying to reason this through physically, by imagining what happens to the gas molecules and their energy as the volume decreases. So far, what I have is this.

More work will be required in compressing the gas adiabatically than isothermally. The reason for this is that, as you press on the gas to reduce its volume, you increase its energy by doing work on it. In an isothermal process, this energy is not allowed to increase the gas's temperature. It will be 'sapped out' of the gas by a cold bath reservoir or something of that nature. In an adiabatic process, however, the energy you transfer to the gas by doing work on it (compressing it) has no way of leaving the container, so it stays there and makes the molecules more energetic (i.e. raises temperature), which means you have to do more work still to compress the gas down further.

Is this a correct intuition about the adiabatic versus isothermal case?

As for the adiabatic vs isobaric case, as you compress the gas, in order for the pressure to stay the same, the temperature has to drop. This means the internal energy has to drop. Whereas in the adiabatic case, the internal energy had to increase. Does this mean the adiabatic case requires more work, since the molecules have more energy with which to 'resist' the compression?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ghost Repeater said:

Homework Statement



This is a conceptual question.

An ideal gas is compressed to half its initial volume by means of several possible processes. Which of the following processes results in the most work done on the gas? a) isothermal b) adiabatic c) isobaric d) The work done is independent of the process.

2. Homework Equations

I'm deliberately trying to avoid using equations. I'm trying to reason it out 'physically' rather than 'algebraically' using formulas.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
As I said, I'm trying to reason this through physically, by imagining what happens to the gas molecules and their energy as the volume decreases. So far, what I have is this.

More work will be required in compressing the gas adiabatically than isothermally. The reason for this is that, as you press on the gas to reduce its volume, you increase its energy by doing work on it. In an isothermal process, this energy is not allowed to increase the gas's temperature. It will be 'sapped out' of the gas by a cold bath reservoir or something of that nature. In an adiabatic process, however, the energy you transfer to the gas by doing work on it (compressing it) has no way of leaving the container, so it stays there and makes the molecules more energetic (i.e. raises temperature), which means you have to do more work still to compress the gas down further.

Is this a correct intuition about the adiabatic versus isothermal case?

As for the adiabatic vs isobaric case, as you compress the gas, in order for the pressure to stay the same, the temperature has to drop. This means the internal energy has to drop. Whereas in the adiabatic case, the internal energy had to increase. Does this mean the adiabatic case requires more work, since the molecules have more energy with which to 'resist' the compression?
Yes and yes. Now, compare isothermal with isobaric.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
49
Views
3K