Work Done line Integral question - Electrostatics - help please

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of work done (WD) in electrostatics, specifically using the line integral of the electric field vector, ##\vec E##. The correct expression for work done is identified as ##WD = q(3x_1^2y_1 - y_1^3)##, correcting a previous error that omitted a square. The participants confirm the curl-free nature of the electric field and validate the potential function ##V = -\nabla\cdot E##. An alternative path for verification is also suggested, reinforcing the accuracy of the derived result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics principles
  • Familiarity with line integrals in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts and potential functions
  • Ability to perform gradient and divergence operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of curl-free vector fields in electrostatics
  • Learn about line integrals and their applications in physics
  • Explore the relationship between electric potential and electric field
  • Investigate alternative methods for calculating work done in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, vector calculus, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and work done calculations.

smileandbehappy
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
16751527103_7b9f233588_b.jpg


17345858046_fe1f8aaecc_b.jpg


Can anyone please tell me where I am going wrong? I am getting the incorrect answer for the Word Done should be: WD = q(3x^2-6y) ...

Apologies for not changing it into the format on here - but for my revision I have pretty much done that myself.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You showed that ##\vec E## as given is curl free. Well done.
Then you worked out that ##\displaystyle q\int_{(0,0,0)}^{(x_1, y_1,0)} \vec E\cdot \vec{dl} = q\left(3x_1^2y_1 - y_1^3\right )## (small omission of the ##^2## ).

To check it, you could verify that ##V = -\nabla\cdot E## is satisfied if ##-V(x,y,z) = 3x^2y - y^3## and then you can immediately see that W.D. is what you found (when you fix the missing square) and not q(3x2-6y).

You could double check with another path: from (0,0,0) to (0, y1, 0) and then to ( x1, 0, 0) which givves the very same result.

Have some faith and if we're both wrong don't hesitate to inform me with another post ! I love (:wink:) to be corrected when I'm wrong.

(happens all the time :cry: )
-
 
Thanks - I guess I was just doubting myself! Really appreciate you helping me out like that. Sam.
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
965
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K