Work done to move spring displacement

Click For Summary
To calculate the work done in changing the length of a spring from 2 cm to 10 cm, the spring's stiffness (95 N/m) and relaxed length (5 cm) are essential. The force exerted by the spring is not constant, requiring integration to accurately determine work done. The correct approach involves using the equation W = ∫ F(x) dx, where F(x) is the spring force as a function of displacement. A misunderstanding of the force's constancy led to initial errors in calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing variable forces in work calculations.
gunster
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spring has a relaxed length of 5 cm and a
stiffness of 95 N/m. How much work must you
do to change its length from 2 cm to 10 cm?

k=95
Lnull=0.05
delta x = .1-.02 = 0.08


Homework Equations



F=-kx
W=Fdcostheta


The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly have tried everything and am beginning to think I am way off the mark and missed something. But what i tried was

W = Fdcostheta where F = -kx

Therefore, since force changes direction after the displacement is past the relaxed spring length, i used:

W = -95 * (0.05-0.02) * (0.05-0.02) cos 0 + -95 * (0.1-0.5) * (0.1-0.5) cos 180


But that was apparently completely wrong. any help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F = F d \cos \theta is only valid if the force is constant over the distance (not a function of x in this case). Your force is a function of x, so you will have to integrate to get the work. It's possible you can solve the problem with a energy approach if integrals are beyond your course material.

W = \int F(x) dx
 
EDIT: nvm realized my mistake was suppose to subtract

Thanks a lot for reminding me force is not constant XD
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K