Work/Energy of Two Bungee Jumpers

  • Thread starter Thread starter kcolman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bungee
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the physics of two bungee jumpers, specifically analyzing the work and energy involved when jumper A releases jumper B at the maximum displacement. The bungee cord has a stiffness of k = 80 lb/ft, and the distance from the bridge to the water is 120 ft. The calculations reveal that jumper A ascends to a height of 240 ft after releasing jumper B, effectively doubling his initial height. The conversation also highlights the importance of considering the downward force exerted by the bungee cord once jumper A surpasses the bridge height.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the principle of work and energy in physics
  • Familiarity with spring force equations, specifically U1-2 = -ksΔs²
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Basic grasp of kinetic energy concepts and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the dynamics of spring forces and their applications
  • Explore the effects of forces acting on objects in free fall
  • Investigate real-world applications of bungee jumping physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those interested in mechanics and energy transformations, as well as educators seeking practical examples of physics principles in action.

kcolman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Exercise 1. Two bungee jumpers jump from a bridge. Jumper A is fastened to a bungee cord and holding on to jumper B. The cord has a stiffness k = 80 lb/ft. Find the unstretched length of the cord if the two students just reach the surface of the water at the maximum displacement. If student A let's go of student B at the surface of the water. Is there a problem for student A on the return? The distance between the bridge and water is 120 ft.


Homework Equations


T1 + ƩU1-2 = T2
U1-2 = -WΔy Work of a weight
U1-2 = -ksΔs2 Work of a Spring Force


The Attempt at a Solution



I solved the first part by using the principle of work and energy, setting T1 and T2 to zero and solving for the s-initial. However, I'm having trouble with the second part. I know that the potential energy from the first part gets transferred to the bungee jumpers kinetic energy in his ascension, and that his final height will be higher than if he didn't let go of the other bungee jumper. Also, I know his final kinetic energy will be zero at his maximum height, and I think the question wants to know if this height will be greater than the height of the bridge over water. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi kcolman! welcome to pf! :smile:
kcolman said:
… I know that the potential energy from the first part gets transferred to the bungee jumpers kinetic energy in his ascension, and that his final height will be higher than if he didn't let go of the other bungee jumper. Also, I know his final kinetic energy will be zero at his maximum height, and I think the question wants to know if this height will be greater than the height of the bridge over water.

that analysis looks correct …

so will it be greater? (if so, by roughly how much?) :wink:
 
Okay, I think I figured it out. I realized that the energy from the spring is equal to the total original gravitational energy, and set that equal to the work done by gravity with the weight cut in half. So my work looks like:

(1/2)kΔs = (W1+W2)y1
(1/2)kΔs = W1*y2
y2 = ((W1+W2)y1)/W1
y2 = (300 lb * 120 ft) / (150 lb)
y2 = 240 ft

So he doubles his initial height on his ascension... Probably hits his head pretty brutally. Does this look right?
 
hi kcolman! :smile:

yes, it will certainly rise well above the bridge

but it's not clear to me whether you've taken into account the downward force that the bungee rope will exert once he gets above the bridge

(and now I'm off to sleep :zzz: …)
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K