Work that must be done to charge a spherical shell

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to charge a spherical shell of radius R = 0.100 m to a total charge of Q = 125 μC. The key equations utilized include the electric potential V = k_e * Q / R and the work done W = ∫(k_e * q / R) dq from 0 to Q. Participants clarified the relationship between electric potential and work, emphasizing that the potential at the surface of the shell is constant while charging. The final expression for total work is derived as W = (k_e / R) * ∫(q) dq evaluated from 0 to Q.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, particularly Coulomb's law and electric fields.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, specifically evaluating definite integrals.
  • Knowledge of electric potential and its relationship to work done in charging objects.
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions and equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for spherical charge distributions.
  • Learn about the application of integral calculus in physics, particularly in electrostatics.
  • Explore the concept of work done in electric fields and its mathematical formulation.
  • Practice using LaTeX for formatting mathematical equations and expressions in discussions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on electrostatics, electrical engineering, and anyone involved in calculations related to electric fields and potentials.

ElPimiento
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
1. Calculate the work that must be done on charges brought from infinity to charge a spherical shell of radius
R = 0.100 m to a total charge of Q = 125 μC.2. V = k_e\int{\frac{dq}{r}}\triangle V = - \int{E \cdot ds}W = q\triangle V3. I started with assuming the spherical shell produces an electric field equal to that of a point charge, so
E = k_e \frac{q}{r^2}
V = k_e \frac{q}{r} (since they're coming from infinity the initial potential is 0)
But once I get to this point I don't know where to go, I tried sort of just using the fundamental charge for q in
W = q\triangle V
to no success. I also tried a similar method to the aforementioned, where I started by assuming each infinitesimal bit of work could be given by:
dW = k_e \frac {e}{r} dq
But I don't know how to evaluate this as an integral.
So how should I set up this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Capsicum annuum :smile:, :welcome:

So you start from an uncharged sphere and bring a little charge ##dq## from infinity to the surface of the sphere. For free, because no force is needed. We can ignore subtle complicated effects because ##dq## is infinitesimally small.

Once there is some charge q on the sphere (which -- as I hope you know -- distributes itself evenly over the outer surface), the potential at the surface is ##k_e q\over R##. So then the work to bring a little charge ##dq## from infinity to the surface of the sphere is, as you wrote, more or less, $$dW = {k_e q\over R}\; dq$$
For the last bit of charge ##dq## to be added, there is (almost completely) a charge ##Q## on the sphere and you can expect that the work needed is $$dW = {k_e Q\over R}\; dq$$
Do you now see what the integral $$W = \int dW $$ should be ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ElPimiento and gracy
Thank you so much! That makes a lot of sense, so the field from the spherical shell is
W = {k_e q\over R}\;
so to move a charge, dq, to its surface takes an amount of work
dW = {k_e q\over R}\; dq
and R is constant in this case (obviously, I should have realized that lol) so we can move it and Coulomb's constant out of the integral:
W = {k_e \over R} \int (q) dq
evaluated from 0 to Q (idk how to put the endpoints), in order to get the total work.

Thank yo so much, his gives the right answer! But is my logic behind it right?
 
Well done.

Latex uses _ for the lower limit and ^ for the upper, so \int_0^Q gives $$\int_0^Q$$ when you use the double $ for displayed equations and ##\int_0^Q## when you use the double # for in-text equations
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ElPimiento and gracy
@ElPimiento Take his advice on latex. That really helps.
 
Thanks for all the help.
 
ElPimiento said:
Thank yo so much, his gives the right answer! But is my logic behind it right?
Not quite. Your first equation, W= etc., you describe as the field. You mean the potential, and it should therefore be V=...
To get to the second equation, you multiplied the right hand side by dq, so you should do the same to the left, giving Vdq. Now you can validly replace Vdq by dW.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
999
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K