I Working model to demonstrate Lagrange points L4 & L5 -- possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrange points
Click For Summary
Fabricating a surface that allows a bead to roll in an orbit around L4 or L5 is theoretically possible, but practical challenges exist. High friction levels and vibrations from spinning on a turntable could quickly decay the orbits, necessitating extremely smooth surfaces and precise bearings. The shape of the gravity wells must be accurately manufactured to achieve the desired effects. Experimentation with turntable speed is crucial to find the optimal conditions for maintaining Lagrange points. Additionally, gyroscopic effects could either disrupt or potentially enhance the bead's behavior in orbit.
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
774
If we fabricate a surface like this...

1694162616033.png


(source:www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PHvDj4TDfM)

... and rotate it around the appropriate vertical axis at the appropriate speed, would it be possible to get a bead to roll in an "orbit" around L4 or L5.

(a) Possible at all in principle?

(b) Practical challenges?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
At the moment I am not able to access that site -- "network error". (All other usual sites are accessible)
I will try later.
 
I see no reason it couldn’t work in principle, but I think it may be too difficult in practical terms.

Even for large museum quality rigid gravity demonstrations friction is pretty high and the orbits decay quickly. You’d have to make it as smooth as possible.

Spinning it on a turntable will introduce vibration that will also decay the orbits. You’d need good bearings.

Another issue would be getting the shape of the gravity wells just right. I don’t know how you would precisely manufacture the double well surface.

You’d have to experiment with the turntable speed, but you should be able to calculate a speed that gives the best Lagrange points. The turntable speed would need to have precise controls
 
I just found this video that is a bit similar in concept, and it seems to work pretty robustly...



That said, the L4 - L5 problem is much more complex since it involves more things that you have to get just right.

And I found this video which leads to believe that gyroscopic effects in the rolling ball would probably change the behavior in a drastic way and break everything.



Or maybe if one is lucky, the gyroscopic effect may actually make it work better than it would otherwise.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
12K
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K