I Working model to demonstrate Lagrange points L4 & L5 -- possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrange points
AI Thread Summary
Fabricating a surface that allows a bead to roll in an orbit around L4 or L5 is theoretically possible, but practical challenges exist. High friction levels and vibrations from spinning on a turntable could quickly decay the orbits, necessitating extremely smooth surfaces and precise bearings. The shape of the gravity wells must be accurately manufactured to achieve the desired effects. Experimentation with turntable speed is crucial to find the optimal conditions for maintaining Lagrange points. Additionally, gyroscopic effects could either disrupt or potentially enhance the bead's behavior in orbit.
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
763
If we fabricate a surface like this...

1694162616033.png


(source:www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PHvDj4TDfM)

... and rotate it around the appropriate vertical axis at the appropriate speed, would it be possible to get a bead to roll in an "orbit" around L4 or L5.

(a) Possible at all in principle?

(b) Practical challenges?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
At the moment I am not able to access that site -- "network error". (All other usual sites are accessible)
I will try later.
 
I see no reason it couldn’t work in principle, but I think it may be too difficult in practical terms.

Even for large museum quality rigid gravity demonstrations friction is pretty high and the orbits decay quickly. You’d have to make it as smooth as possible.

Spinning it on a turntable will introduce vibration that will also decay the orbits. You’d need good bearings.

Another issue would be getting the shape of the gravity wells just right. I don’t know how you would precisely manufacture the double well surface.

You’d have to experiment with the turntable speed, but you should be able to calculate a speed that gives the best Lagrange points. The turntable speed would need to have precise controls
 
I just found this video that is a bit similar in concept, and it seems to work pretty robustly...



That said, the L4 - L5 problem is much more complex since it involves more things that you have to get just right.

And I found this video which leads to believe that gyroscopic effects in the rolling ball would probably change the behavior in a drastic way and break everything.



Or maybe if one is lucky, the gyroscopic effect may actually make it work better than it would otherwise.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top