Working out an equation for forces upon an object

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike Charlie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the forces acting upon an object and formulating an equation that incorporates these forces, particularly in the context of perpetual motion. Participants explore classical physics concepts and the implications of these forces on the feasibility of perpetual motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant lists forces such as gravity, air resistance, momentum, and friction, seeking assistance in creating a comprehensive formula.
  • Another participant argues that verbal lists do not suffice for formulating equations in classical mechanics and emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of mathematics and physics.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that perpetual motion does not violate classical physics laws, citing Newton's first law of motion and discussing the role of external forces in stopping motion.
  • This participant also proposes that friction and air resistance are manifestations of electromagnetic interactions and lists gravity and electromagnetism as the two fundamental forces of classical physics.
  • Concerns are raised about the utility of formulas, with one participant suggesting that they may not address the core issue of why perpetual motion is considered impossible.
  • A clarification is made that momentum is not a force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of perpetual motion and the relevance of forces listed. There is no consensus on a definitive formula or understanding of perpetual motion, and multiple competing perspectives remain present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the definitions of forces and the complexity of formulating equations without specific systems. There is also an acknowledgment of the need for specificity in discussing the theoretical motion of systems.

Mike Charlie
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am a very inquisitive person and the other day I started to think about perpetual motion. Since then I have been trying to name the forces that act upon an object and place them into a formula. The whole idea of the formula is really just so I can see what laws of physics need to be broken to allow perpetual motion to work.

All I have been able to come up with so far is some forces that act upon an object and I know I will have missed a lot. These are:-
  • Gravity
  • Air Resistance
  • Momentum
  • Friction

What I am asking is for help listing the forces that act upon an object and a formula which includes all of the named forces.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mike Charlie said:
Since then I have been trying to name the forces that act upon an object and place them into a formula.

Verbal lists are not the basis for the formulas of classical mechanics. An object in a mechanical system is often acted upon by forces exerted by other objects. Adding "forces exerted by other objects" to a list doesn't tell you how to incorporate such forces in a formula.

I suppose there is nothing good or bad about being an inquisitive person. Being inquisitive can be practiced as a form of amusement, rather like watching TV. Or you can be both inquisitive and determined to find answers. If you want answers to the the formulae of phyics, you'll have to study real mathematics and phyics, not simply make lists.
 
In terms of classical physics, perpetual motion is entirely possible, it does not violate any of those laws of physics. In fact perpetual motion is basically an axiom of classical physics: Newton's first law of motion, inertia, the assumption that an object in motion will keep moving in a straight line (or keep spinning) forever unless it is acted upon by an external force.

The reason why perpetual motion is 'impossible' realistically is exactly because of that 'external force', like the ones you've listed, which eventually cause the object to stop (in our perspective). Technically, the motion is still occurring though, the motion has just shifted to density waves in the air (i.e. made a sound), or produced vibrations in the object and the surroundings (i.e. warmed stuff up), so, from this perspective, perpetual motion is impossible to avoid (simply because of the axioms of classical physics).

If you want to complete your list, you really only need to list the two fundamental forces of classical physics:
- Gravity
- Electromagnetism
Everything else will just be some form of the previous two forces. Friction and air resistance, for example, is just a manifestation of the overall electromagnetic interactions between the object with the external system.

Another more elaborate example would be a machine that uses electricity to move an object which then uses the movement to generate more electricity to move the object some more. This system eventually stops because the the electrons interact electromagnetically with the atoms in the wires to produce vibrations (i.e. increased temperature), which in turn causes the electrons to lose some of their motion.

I hope you don't feel too unsatisfied that you haven't received any formulae. Personally I don't think they would have been that useful because they'd just give you the theoretical motion of the system, not explain what seems to be the core issue, that is, why perpetual motion is 'impossible'. Not to mention the fact that you'd have to get very specific about the system, and the equations would probably get very uselessly complicated (to be honest I'd have a very hard time calculating the exact motion of something like a hammer attached to a spinning wheel).

Momentum isn't a force by the way X).
 
Thanks, that has really helped me in my understanding in perpetual motion. I can put my mind at rest now. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
5K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K