Working w/ Complex representation E-field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the representation of time-varying electric fields (E-fields) in complex format, specifically using the equation \(\vec{E}(t)=E_o e^{\omega t}\cdot\hat{k}\). It clarifies that when calculating the potential from a complex E-field, one does not need to convert to a real representation before taking the gradient. The gradient operation is spatial, while the complex notation, including time-dependent factors like \(e^{i\omega t}\), can be used directly in calculations without modification, ensuring accurate results in accordance with Maxwell's equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field representation in physics
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their applications in physics
  • Knowledge of gradient operations in vector calculus
  • Basic principles of Maxwell's equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of complex numbers in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the gradient operation in vector calculus
  • Explore the implications of Maxwell's equations on time-varying fields
  • Investigate the use of complex notation in other areas of physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism who are interested in advanced representations of electric fields and their implications in theoretical and applied contexts.

Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Often a time varying E-field is represented in complex format. I have a simple E-field (uniform in space) given by

[itex]\vec{E}(t)=E_o\cos(\omega t)\cdot\hat{k}[/itex]
or equivalently, the real part of

[itex]\vec{E}(t)=E_o e^{\omega t}\cdot\hat{k}[/itex].

We know the potential is the negative gradient of the E-field.
If we want to calculate the potential of a field represented in the complex notation, do we need first convert to the "real" representation of and then take the gradient?

In other words how do we deal with all the calculations when the field is represented in the complex format.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apteronotus said:
We know the potential is the negative gradient of the E-field.

You have this the wrong way round. The E-field component in a particular direction is minus the gradient in that direction of the potential.

The answer to your question – suitably modified! – is that eiwt can be left in unmodified. It is a time-dependent factor; the gradient operation is a spatial one.
 
Even when you come across time operators, such as in Maxwell's equations, you can stick with complex notation. The imaginary numbers behave very nicely and you still get the right answer in the end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K