Wormhole Travel: 10 LY Away in an Instant?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter billbray
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of wormhole travel, specifically regarding instantaneous travel to a star 10 light-years away. Participants explore the concept of Minkowski space and its 4D nature, asserting that arriving at a distant star would not align with a common 'now' due to the time taken for light to travel. The conversation also touches on the twin paradox, questioning whether two ships traveling at the speed of light (v = c) would have synchronized clocks upon return. Ultimately, it concludes that while wormholes may allow for causality violations, symmetric trips do result in clock agreement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space and 4D space-time concepts
  • Familiarity with the theory of relativity and its implications on time dilation
  • Knowledge of quantum entanglement and its relation to causality
  • Basic principles of wormhole physics and their theoretical frameworks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wormhole travel on causality and time perception
  • Study the twin paradox in detail, focusing on scenarios involving multiple reference frames
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of Minkowski space and its applications in physics
  • Investigate quantum entanglement and its effects on information transfer across distances
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the complexities of wormhole travel, relativity, and quantum mechanics.

billbray
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
1. If I traveled in a wormhole from Earth to a distant star 10 LY away, and arrived there instantly, when would I arrive at the star? Would I be there 10 years ago, as the light took 10 years to reach Earth? If Minkowski space is truly 4D i.e., space-time, then I can't arrive at some objective 'now' since there is no common instant in time common to any two points in space no matter how close or distant. The only common 'now' would be the 10 year old photons reaching Earth - as I leave and arrive at the distant star 10 LY away... I should be there at the same time the photons left the star, 10 years ago? Relativity doesn't apply for v >c, i.e., instnataneous travel. Isn't this the same as two very distant entagled particles or photons - or a double slit experiment, violating causality?

2. If two ships each leave a common point speeding away from each other equally at v = c, to a distance of 2LY (1 LY travel for each) and each turns around and speeds back to the starting point at v = c, do their clocks agree? Unlike 1 ship speeding away and back (twin paradox) , there's no fixed reference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you arrive depends on the unknown conditions of that wormhole. It could be "now" in Earth's reference frame. In most cases wormholes allow violations of causality.
billbray said:
Isn't this the same as two very distant entagled particles or photons - or a double slit experiment, violating causality?
No, these things don't violate causality.
billbray said:
2. If two ships each leave a common point speeding away from each other equally at v = c, to a distance of 2LY (1 LY travel for each) and each turns around and speeds back to the starting point at v = c, do their clocks agree?
Yes, with symmetric trips the clocks will agree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
9K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K