Would a gun with this barrel shape generate less recoil?

  • Thread starter Thread starter y2jayy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gun Shape
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for a specific gun barrel shape, described as a plus-sign configuration of L-shaped pipes, to reduce recoil when the gun is fired. Participants explore the mechanics of gas redirection and conservation of momentum, considering both theoretical implications and practical examples from existing weapon designs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the L-shaped pipe configuration could divert gas in a way that minimizes recoil by canceling forces acting parallel and perpendicular to the barrel.
  • Another participant counters that the conservation of linear momentum still applies, indicating that recoil would not be eliminated and would still occur due to impulse at the back of the gun.
  • Some participants reference the principle behind recoilless rifles and muzzle brakes, suggesting that redirecting gases can mitigate recoil, but emphasize that these systems are not closed and require gas release.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of the proposed design, questioning whether it would produce the same recoil as a conventional gun or less, but still greater than zero.
  • There is mention of the historical use of recoilless rifles during WWII, with one participant affirming that the original post's idea aligns with established principles.
  • Another participant discusses the potential design of a weapon that allows for slow gas expulsion to effectively suppress recoil.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the effectiveness of the proposed barrel shape in reducing recoil. While some acknowledge the theoretical basis for gas redirection, others maintain that recoil cannot be fully eliminated and remains a significant factor.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about gas behavior, the necessity of gas release for recoil reduction, and the implications of momentum conservation, which remain unresolved.

y2jayy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I was wondering whether the following gun barrel shape would generate less recoil.

Imagine that we have a bunch of L-shaped pipes which are closed on their long end and open on their short end. Take 4 of these pipes, and join them up along their short parts so that they form a plus-sign shape when viewed from above. Then, this 4-pipe structure is attached to the barrel of a gun and, in effect, made into the gun's stock.

When the gun is fired, as the bullet is pushed forward by the gas, the gas is pushed backwards. But then the shape of the "L-shaped piped barrel" would divert the direction of the backward-moving gas along the axis perpendicular to the axis of the gun's barrel. Finally, the gas would collide with the closed ends of the 4 pipes, but would do so in a way that the force imparted would, first, in the component parallel to the barrel of the gun, be 0 or close to it since the recoil force would be acting on a surface (the pipe's end) parallel to the barrel of the gun and in the component perpendicular to the barrel of the gun, also 0 since each of the 4 vectors that would point outward along the pieces of the "plus sign" would add to 0.

Wouldn't the above mechanism damp the gun's recoil without requiring the gases to be discharged from the gun, as in the traditional recoilless rifles?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No. The situation still reduces to the principle of the conservation of linear momentum, and you will still get a kick. The forces you speak of will cancel, but you will still have the impulse at the back of the gun, ie. in your case at the locations of the L curvature.

If you want a gun without recoil, you need to shoot 2 equivalent bullets simultaneously in opposite directions...or something equivalent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
Chip said:
No. The situation still reduces to the principle of the conservation of linear momentum, and you will still get a kick. The forces you speak of will cancel, but you will still have the impulse at the back of the gun, ie. in your case at the locations of the L curvature.

If you want a gun without recoil, you need to shoot 2 equivalent bullets simultaneously in opposite directions...or something equivalent.

So you're saying that there would be the exactly same amount of recoil in the gun I described and a "normal" gun (all other things between the two guns being the same of course)? Or that the recoil will be less, but still greater than zero.

I understand what you mean by the impulse at the back of the gun being imparted to the L-curvature. But assuming that the gases are still moving at nonzero speed (which seems a totally valid assumption), surely it means that some of the momentum of the gases is dissipated in a direction perpendicular to the barrel of the gun, and thus not affecting the recoil...?
 
I think a muzzle brake kind works on that principle, but deflecting exhaust gasses to the side rather than letting them go forward and contribute to kick
 
It works! At least the OP's post was on the right track. The WWII recoil less rifle used this principle. I provided a link in #3.

740px-Recoilless_rifle_schematic.svg.png
 
excellent weapon..but had to use string to bore sight it..and ..it was VERY heavy to hump with your other gear...but was great weapon for the Infantryman
 
Ranger Mike said:
but had to use string to bore sight i

Huh? I don't understand that.

Edit: Thank you for your service.
 
Thank you for the nice reply and we should leave this subject to the past please.
 
  • #10
Muzzle brakes and recoilless rifles use redirection of the expanding gasses, the same as in the op's question but those are not closed systems, that gas and energy has to be released in some manner for it to be effective in reducing recoil. Some muzzle brakes aren't so much designed to reduce the kick of a weapon as they are used to stabilize the weapon itself. But if you could design a weapon in a manner like that, (But so the gasses could be expended slowly) it would also effectively suppress it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K