Would a Very Large Mass (e.g. the Moon) Fall with g?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving the behavior of very large masses, specifically the Moon and a marble, when dropped from a height of 100 meters above the Earth's surface. Participants explore concepts of inertia, gravitational acceleration, and the effects of mass on falling objects, while considering both theoretical and hypothetical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the Moon would lag behind the marble due to its greater inertia, while others argue that both would experience the same acceleration towards the Earth.
  • There is a question about whether the bottom or center of the marble is at the same height as the Moon, which leads to different interpretations of the scenario.
  • One participant suggests that if both objects are released from the same height, the marble would hit the ground first because its center of mass is closer to the Earth, resulting in a stronger gravitational field acting on it.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of a superdense marble with the mass of the Moon, suggesting that in this case, both would hit the ground at the same time.
  • Some participants note that the gravitational interaction between the Earth and the Moon would affect the outcome, indicating that the presence of the Moon alters the dynamics of the fall.
  • A later reply discusses the concept of a common center of mass and how both the Earth and Moon would accelerate towards this point, affecting their rates of closure.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the effects of inertia, suggesting that it might take time to overcome when considering large masses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the Moon would fall at the same rate as the marble. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effects of inertia, gravitational fields, and the nature of the hypothetical scenario.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of the marble and the Moon, the simplification of gravitational interactions, and the hypothetical nature of the scenario which may not reflect real-world physics accurately.

John Mohr
Messages
23
Reaction score
10
Today, I had a thought experiment where I began to puzzle over inertia of very large masses being dropped.

Imagine a scenario where the Moon was suspended 100 m from the surface of the Earth alongside a marble at the same height. Now ignoring air resistance and the gravity exerted by the Moon on the marble, let's suppose they were "dropped" from that point. Would they hit the Earth's surface at the same time?

My thoughts were that the Moon would lag behind and hit the surface after the marble due to it's great inertia. Also, one would noticeably feel the Earth falling "up" towards the Moon.

Would anyone else like to weigh in on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
John Mohr said:
Imagine a scenario where the Moon was suspended 100 m from the surface of the Earth alongside a marble at the same height.
Is the bottom of the marble at the same height as the bottom of the moon? Or is the center of the marble at the same height as the center of the moon?
 
In any case, moon and marble will move with the same acceleration towards earth

Also, one would noticeably feel the Earth falling "up" towards the Moon.

That's true. You would also notice tide and wind currents-atmospheric pressure changes by just approaching moon to earth
 
John Mohr said:
Today, I had a thought experiment where I began to puzzle over inertia of very large masses being dropped.

Imagine a scenario where the Moon was suspended 100 m from the surface of the Earth alongside a marble at the same height.

Given the Moon is ##3,500km## in diameter, that's not a scenario I can imagine.

A superdense marble with the mass of the moon, perhaps.
 
Dale said:
Is the bottom of the marble at the same height as the bottom of the moon? Or is the center of the marble at the same height as the center of the moon?

Good question! I visualized the bottom of the marble at the same point as the bottom of the Moon (so that both would cover the same distance).
 
PeroK said:
Given the Moon is ##3,500km## in diameter, that's not a scenario I can imagine.

A superdense marble with the mass of the moon, perhaps.
Ah yes, this would be a good idea PeroK. Something like the material of a neutron star with the volume of a marble.
 
John Mohr said:
Good question! I visualized the bottom of the marble at the same point as the bottom of the Moon (so that both would cover the same distance).
So then the marble will hit first, not because it has less inertia, but because its center of mass is closer so the gravitational field is stronger.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: miltos and PeroK
John Mohr said:
Ah yes, this would be a good idea PeroK. Something like the material of a neutron star with the volume of a marble.
In this scenario they would hit at the same time.
 
Dale said:
So then the marble will hit first, not because it has less inertia, but because its center of mass is closer so the gravitational field is stronger.
Ah yes Dale, very cool. I would agree for this scenario as the center of mass and center of gravity would be a quite different points.
 
  • #10
John Mohr said:
Ah yes Dale, very cool. I would agree for this scenario as the center of mass and center of gravity would be a quite different points.
But if I may add, the only reason they hit at the same time is because the superdense marble is pulling on Earth which changes the outcomes for both the marbles. If we tried the experiment twice, once with the superdense marble and once with the regular marble, then the superdense marble with hit the Earth in less time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: John Mohr
  • #11
Choosing the common and non-accelerating center of mass of Earth plus moon as the reference frame, then the acceleration of the moon towards that common center of mass is due to Earth's gravity field. The Earth would also be accelerating towards the common center of mass due to the moon's gravitational field. The combined masses affect the rate of closure, but not the rate of acceleration towards a common center of mass.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and John Mohr
  • #12
I'm not sure if it's because I've watched too many Star Wars movies of star destroyers crashing down to the surface's of various planets slowly, but it seemed to me like the inertia would take time to overcome.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K