I Would Icarus' wings fly in Earth's atmosphere and moon gravity?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of Icarus' wings generating enough lift in Earth's atmosphere and lunar gravity. Participants question the specific weight ratio of 1/11th a human's weight, noting that lunar gravity is actually 1/6th. The conversation highlights the challenges of determining lift without a defined wing design and references the melting point of materials used in the myth. Comparisons are made to real birds, like the wandering albatross, to assess potential wing dimensions. Ultimately, the thread suggests a shift towards exploring optimized human-powered flight rather than focusing solely on the mythological aspect.
dedocta
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
Could they generate enough lift for 1/11th the weight of a human? Was picturing a giant warehouse and curious if it would work!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dedocta said:
Could they generate enough lift for 1/11th the weight of a human? Was picturing a giant warehouse and curious if it would work!
:oldconfused: Why 1/11th? Lunar gravity is 1/6.

Practically, there's no way to really know. How do you decide how much lift a human could produce without first choosing or designing the wings?
 
We have the legend of Icarus flying in the atmosphere.
The problem then was the melting point of the bee's wax used to attach the feathers.
 
Oh my goodness - 1/6th thanks Dave! Bit of a spaceshot here haha. Thats a good point.
 
A wandering albatross weighs around 25 lbs and has a 10 ft wingspan so the dimensions would not be unreasonable.
 
dedocta said:
Could they generate enough lift for 1/116th the weight of a human? Was picturing a giant warehouse and curious if it would work!
Since this thread start is in the technical Physics forms and not SciFi, shouldn't you be asking about how much farther optimized human powered flight could fly?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_human-powered_aircraft
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K