Would one consider the following to be a monopole, or a dipole?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gravitas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Monopole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of a spherical object with differing polarities at its surface and center. It concludes that such a spherically symmetric object qualifies as a monopole due to its uniform charge density. The distinction is based on spherical harmonic expansions, where the angular dependency of the scalar potential reveals that only the lowest order spherical harmonic is present, indicating a monopole field. If the charge is electric, the object is specifically termed an electric monopole.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dipole and monopole concepts in electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with spherical harmonic expansions
  • Knowledge of scalar potential in electric fields
  • Basic principles of charge density and symmetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study spherical harmonic expansions in detail
  • Explore the properties of electric monopoles and their fields
  • Research the implications of charge density on field symmetry
  • Examine real-world applications of monopole and dipole theories
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on electromagnetism, theoretical physics, and electrical engineering, will benefit from this discussion.

Gravitas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I hope that I have chosen the correct thread and that this belongs here.
I understand the concept of a dipole, where you have opposite polarities at each end of a lineal object, i.e. a magnet. My question concerns the case of a sphere, where the outer surface is one polarity and the center is another, rather than a sphere that is merely 'half and half'. Considering that one pole is completely surrounded (enclosed) by the other pole, does this still count as a dipole, or does it now qualify as a monopole. Also, what are the criteria that would allow one to distinguish between different types (arrangements) of poles, to qualify as mono- vs di-? Thanks in advance for your help in enlightening me on this point. Gravitas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitas said:
I hope that I have chosen the correct thread and that this belongs here.
I understand the concept of a dipole, where you have opposite polarities at each end of a lineal object, i.e. a magnet. My question concerns the case of a sphere, where the outer surface is one polarity and the center is another, rather than a sphere that is merely 'half and half'. Considering that one pole is completely surrounded (enclosed) by the other pole, does this still count as a dipole, or does it now qualify as a monopole. Also, what are the criteria that would allow one to distinguish between different types (arrangements) of poles, to qualify as mono- vs di-? Thanks in advance for your help in enlightening me on this point. Gravitas

Since it is completely spherically symmetric, it is a monopole.

The definition has to do with so-called spherical harmonic expansions of e.g. the angular dependency of the scalar potential that surrounds the object, due to the charges it contains. Since your object contains charge densities of some kind, it is surrounded by such a field. Since the charge density is spherically symmetric, the spherical harmonic expansion of the angular dependent part of this field will contain only the lowest order spherical harmonic. Therefore, this is called a monopole field. If the charge is electric, your object is called an electric monopole.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
79
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
33K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K