Would someone be able to isolate v?

  • Thread starter Thread starter terff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    variable
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around isolating the variable \( v_0 \) in a physics equation related to projectile motion. The original poster presents a derived equation involving trigonometric functions and acceleration, seeking assistance in algebraic manipulation to solve for \( v_0 \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to isolate \( v_0 \), with some providing algebraic manipulations and simplifications. Questions arise regarding the accuracy of the equation and the correctness of the values used in calculations. There is also a focus on dimensional analysis and the implications of potential errors in the setup.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering insights into the algebraic process and questioning the assumptions made in the original equation. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need for careful substitution of values and the importance of dimensional consistency, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the derived equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in calculated values and express uncertainty about the experimental setup. There is mention of specific values for angle and displacement, as well as the need to verify the accuracy of measurements and calculations.

terff
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I have a group lab for physics, but I need some alg/trig help isolating v for a derived equation.
I've tried many times to to get v0 by itself but when I check the equation with the values that I have for each variable I always get the wrong answer.
∆y = v0(sinθ)(∆x/v0(cosθ)) + ½(a)(∆x/v0(cosθ))2)

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


Well my attempt was,
∆y = v0(sinθ)(∆x/v0(cosθ)) + ½(a)(∆x/v0(cosθ))2
then simplify the fractions in the addition
∆y = (sinθ)∆x/cosθ + (a)(∆x2)/(2v02(cosθ)2)
and then multiply by cosθ2 on both sides
∆y(cosθ)2 = (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) + (a)(∆x2)/2v02
subtract (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) on both sides
∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) = (a)(∆x2)/2v02
multiply 2v02 on both sides, then divide by 2∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) to get
v02 by itself
(a)(∆x2)/(2∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x)) = v02
and then sqrt both sides
√(a(∆x2)/(2∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x))) = v0

I tried it a few times with known values, once it came back correct, but with the other values, I tried multiple times and always got a wrong answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
terff said:
1. Homework Statement
So I have a group lab for physics, but I need some alg/trig help isolating v for a derived equation.
I've tried many times to to get v0 by itself but when I check the equation with the values that I have for each variable I always get the wrong answer.
∆y = v0(sinθ)(∆x/v0(cosθ)) + ½(a)(∆x/v0(cosθ))2)
So this equation, and you want to put it in the form ##v_0=\cdots##

Well my attempt was,
∆y = v0(sinθ)(∆x/v0(cosθ)) + ½(a)(∆x/v0(cosθ))2
... this first line is different from what you wrote above. Which is it?

Continuing form here, am I reading that correctly? You wrote:
$$\Delta y = v_0\sin\theta\left(\frac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos\theta}\right) + \frac{1}{2}a\left( \frac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos\theta} \right)^2$$
... that looks likely since it appears to be a ballistics calculation with ##\Delta x/(v_0\cos\theta)## being the time of flight, and a will end up being -g.

This simplifies to:
$$2 (\Delta y \cos^2\theta)v_0^2 = (2 \Delta x \sin\theta\cos\theta)v_0^2 + a(\Delta x)^2$$ ... which seems straight forward enough;

I tried it a few times with known values, once it came back correct, but with the other values, I tried multiple times and always got a wrong answer.
... how did you know you got the wrong answer?
 
terff said:

Homework Statement


So I have a group lab for physics, but I need some alg/trig help isolating v for a derived equation.
I've tried many times to to get v0 by itself but when I check the equation with the values that I have for each variable I always get the wrong answer.
∆y = v0(sinθ)(∆x/v0(cosθ)) + ½(a)(∆x/v0(cosθ))2)

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


Well my attempt was,
∆y = v0(sinθ)(∆x/v0(cosθ)) + ½(a)(∆x/v0(cosθ))2
then simplify the fractions in the addition
∆y = (sinθ)∆x/cosθ + (a)(∆x2)/(2v02(cosθ)2)
and then multiply by cosθ2 on both sides
∆y(cosθ)2 = (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) + (a)(∆x2)/2v02
subtract (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) on both sides
∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) = (a)(∆x2)/2v02
multiply 2v02 on both sides, then divide by 2∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x) to get
v02 by itself
(a)(∆x2)/(2∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x)) = v02
and then sqrt both sides
√(a(∆x2)/(2∆y(cosθ)2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x))) = v0

I tried it a few times with known values, once it came back correct, but with the other values, I tried multiple times and always got a wrong answer.

I will write v instead of v0, and x, y instead of Δx, Δy. So, your equation is
[tex]y = \frac{v \sin(\theta) x}{v \cos(\theta)} + \frac{a}{2} \left( \frac{x}{v \cos(\theta)} \right)^2 = x\tan(\theta)+ \frac{a x^2}{2 v^2 \cos(\theta)^2}[/tex]
The solution is straightforward:
[tex]v = \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left| \frac{x}{\cos(\theta)}\right| \sqrt{ \frac{a}{y - x \tan(\theta)}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
So this equation, and you want to put it in the form ##v_0=\cdots##


... this first line is different from what you wrote above. Which is it?

Continuing form here, am I reading that correctly? You wrote:
$$\Delta y = v_0\sin\theta\left(\frac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos\theta}\right) + \frac{1}{2}a\left( \frac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos\theta} \right)^2$$
... that looks likely since it appears to be a ballistics calculation with ##\Delta x/(v_0\cos\theta)## being the time of flight, and a will end up being -g.

This simplifies to:
$$2 (\Delta y \cos^2\theta)v_0^2 = (2 \Delta x \sin\theta\cos\theta)v_0^2 + a(\Delta x)^2$$ ... which seems straight forward enough;

... how did you know you got the wrong answer?

Ahh my apologies,
[itex]∆y = v(sinθ)(\frac{∆x}{v0(cosθ)}) + \frac {1}{2}(a)(\frac{∆x}{v0(cosθ)^2})[/itex]
is the equation, and yes that is what I wrote.

In my final equation
[itex]\sqrt{\frac{2a∆x}{2∆y(cosθ)^2 - (cosθ)(sinθ)(∆x)}} = v[/itex]
substituted the following variables
θ angle= 60º
∆x= 3.78 m
∆y= -.268 m
ay= -9.8 m/s2
[itex]\sqrt{\frac{2(-9.8)(3.78)}{2(-.268)(cos60º)^2 - (cos60º)(sin60º)(3.78)}} = v[/itex]
and I was supposed to get 6.87 m/s for v
instead I was getting 8.56
 
Ahh my apologies,
$$\Delta y = v(\sin\theta)\left(\frac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos\theta}\right) + \frac{1}{2}(a)\left(\frac{\Delta x}{v_0(\cos\theta)^2}\right)$$
is the equation, and yes that is what I wrote.
... That equation is incorrect: check by dimensional analysis and redo the derivation.
(Assuming the leading "v" is a typo and should be ##v_0##?)
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
... check that equation by dimensional analysis.
oops I realize another mistake I did in that equation $$\Delta y = v_0\sin\theta\left(\frac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos\theta}\right) + \frac{1}{2}a\left( \frac{\Delta x}{v_0\cos\theta} \right)^2$$ is correct, the squared is in the wrong place in my fraction.

[itex]-0.268 = v(0.866)(\frac{3.78}{v(0.5)}) + \frac {1}{2}(-9.8)(\frac{3.78}{v(0.5)})^2[/itex]

I got 6.4104
 
I got 6.4104
...m/s yep real physicists get fussy about units too.

Always state the units somewhere.

It is likely the equation is correct now - I cannot be sure because I don't know the experiment you did.
Where does the "correct" value come from? How do you know it's correct?

It looks like you have substituted the values in too soon though ... do the algebra first.

As a rule - the values you measure in the experiment are "correct".
They are the values you got - unless someone wants to say you are lying. Maybe you made a mistake in measurement, maybe you rounded off too far or failed to account for some variation in an instrument reading? If your values disagree with some theoretical value, then your conclusion will state that your results did not support the theory... but you do want to rule out some silly rounding or arithmetic error first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K