Would taking a chemistry class help with physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Taking a basic Chemistry class is not essential for understanding Modern Physics, Statistical and Thermal Physics, or Quantum Mechanics. While some overlap exists, particularly in topics like thermodynamics and atomic structure, the foundational knowledge required for physics is primarily rooted in mathematics and physics itself. Students who have taken General Chemistry report benefits from seeing topics from different perspectives, but it is not strictly necessary for physics majors. A recommendation is to focus on Mathematics and Physics first, as Chemistry knowledge often relies on a solid understanding of Physics principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Modern Physics concepts
  • Familiarity with Statistical and Thermal Physics
  • Basic knowledge of Quantum Mechanics
  • Mathematics skills relevant to physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between thermodynamics and statistical mechanics
  • Explore the principles of Quantum Mechanics in depth
  • Study the kinetic theory of gases and its applications
  • Learn about the overlap between physical chemistry and physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics majors, students preparing for advanced physics courses, and anyone interested in the interplay between chemistry and physics will benefit from this discussion.

Charles Stark
Messages
31
Reaction score
5
Ah ha! So I was looking through the physics classes I will have to take and noticed a lot of topics dealing with atoms and the like. Would it benefit me to take the first installment of basic Chemistry? I don't want to take the lab portion just the lecture section if it would be a tremendous help for what's to come.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What topics/classes?
 
The three in concerned about are Modern Physics, Statistical and Thermal Physics and Quantum Mechanics. I see lots of "particle" and "atomic" in the descriptions
 
Well, if you do, good luck w/ that. I loved just about ever course I ever took but I really hated chem 101. Personally, I'd avoid it like the plague :smile:
 
Charles Stark said:
The three in concerned about are Modern Physics, Statistical and Thermal Physics and Quantum Mechanics. I see lots of "particle" and "atomic" in the descriptions
I'm not sure that chem would add as much as you might think since it's mostly about the interactions of the atoms/molecules rather than stuff like QM, but my dislike of the subject may be clouding my memory/judgement.
 
Charles Stark said:
The three in concerned about are Modern Physics, Statistical and Thermal Physics and Quantum Mechanics. I see lots of "particle" and "atomic" in the descriptions
Well, chemistry doesn't deal with too many particles, except electrons and protons and how they interact in forming chemical compounds. And 'atomic', well, pretty much everything chemical boils down to atoms in combination.

It's pretty much why chemistry and physics, especially atomic physics and particle physics, are all different subjects. There's some different degrees of overlap amongst them, but there's nothing special in a chemistry class which will not be covered in the physics classes you'll take.
 
My experience is much the same as those above. Though some topics will be covered in both (e.g., nuclear physics, a small amount of thermodynamics, and atomic structure), taking a chemistry class to prepare for quantum mechanics is like taking a high school class in world history to prepare for a 300-level college class in eastern European 20th century politics.
 
I took a two semester General Chemistry sequence and I've found it to be beneficial. We've since covered topics in physics that were also covered in chemistry such as thermodynamics. I'm taking Physics III (Modern Physics) this semester, and some of the topics are the kinetic theory of gasses and more thermodynamics, which were both covered in chemistry. We're covering light and optics this semester, and the light spectrum was covered in chemistry. It's not necessarily that having covered some topics in chemistry made it 'easier' to learn them in physics, but it has been helpful to see the topics approached from different perspectives. I enjoyed chemistry for its own merits as well, which could contribute to my take on it. I don't think it's strictly necessary for a physics major to take general chemistry, but I'm definitely glad that I did.

You may not be able to take the lecture without a lab. At my school, a lab component is required for the both semesters of the sequence. I always enjoyed my chem labs though, and I think more lab experience is always helpful.
 
In my experience knowing physics has helped me more in chemistry than knowing chemistry would help me in physics. If you want to do a chemistry that might help with physics take physical chemistry1-2. Although you will have to take gen chem1-2 and possible organic 1.
 
  • #10
IMO not taking chemistry as a physics major would be ridiculous. You need to have knowledge of basic terms and some insight into how stuff works.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumCurt and symbolipoint
  • #11
It would help, just not with physics.
 
  • #12
Charles Stark said:
Ah ha! So I was looking through the physics classes I will have to take and noticed a lot of topics dealing with atoms and the like. Would it benefit me to take the first installment of basic Chemistry? I don't want to take the lab portion just the lecture section if it would be a tremendous help for what's to come.

NO.
Learn Mathematics and some Physics, first, if still possible. You could learn some Chemistry before Physics, but much of Chemistry knowledge relies on Physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
899
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K