Would traveling faster than the speed of light solve the entanglement issue?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of faster-than-light travel on quantum entanglement, particularly in relation to Einstein's concerns about "spooky action at a distance." Participants explore whether such travel could address issues in quantum mechanics or validate existing theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if faster-than-light travel could resolve the entanglement issue in quantum mechanics, referencing Einstein's discomfort with the phenomenon.
  • One participant suggests that entanglement occurs because the particles are in the same quantum state, implying no communication is necessary.
  • Another participant raises the possibility that if something can travel faster than light, it might suggest a form of communication between entangled particles.
  • A later reply references a report of superluminal neutrinos at CERN, indicating that experimental errors were found, which may affect the discussion on faster-than-light travel.
  • One participant acknowledges a lack of awareness regarding the experimental errors related to superluminal neutrinos, indicating a need for further verification of claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether faster-than-light travel could solve the entanglement issue, with no consensus reached on the implications of such travel for quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific experimental findings and theoretical interpretations that may be subject to change as new information emerges. There are unresolved assumptions about the nature of entanglement and the implications of faster-than-light phenomena.

Robleaver
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I do not know a lot about physics, however, I was wondering if anyone would know, now that they think something can travel faster than the speed of light, would that solve the entanglement issue in quantum mechanics or at least the problem Einstein had with it? Or how two particles would be able to contact one in other over long distances spooky action at a distance he called it was niels bohr or einstein right or would the fact that an electron may be able to travel faster than light mean they were both wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Robleaver said:
I do not know a lot about physics, however, I was wondering if anyone would know, now that they think something can travel faster than the speed of light, would that solve the entanglement issue in quantum mechanics or at least the problem Einstein had with it?

There's no problem, entanglement apparently happens because they are the same particle, even mathematically, so no matter what the distance their probabilities will still be equal to each other's.
 
if something can travel faster than light is it possible that they are communicating
 
Robleaver said:
if something can travel faster than light is it possible that they are communicating

They aren't communicating though, they are just occupying the same quantum state.
 
Robleaver said:
now that they think something can travel faster than the speed of light,

Are you by any chance referring to the report of apparent superluminal neutrinos at CERN a few months ago? They've now found a couple of sources of experimental error, and will be testing this shortly:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3779525#post3779525
 
I was referring to CERN and Brian Greene's book The Fabric of the Cosmos as it was presented on NOVA I did not know of the "experimental error's" I should have triple checked that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 276 ·
10
Replies
276
Views
15K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K