Would 'you' be in control of a clone of yourself after you die?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the philosophical implications of cloning and consciousness after death. The original poster questions whether a clone, created with identical DNA but lacking memories and experiences, could be considered "you" or under your control after death. Many participants argue that personal identity is tied to both genetic makeup and life experiences, asserting that a clone would not be the same person. The conversation also touches on concepts of consciousness, the essence of self, and the potential for a "soul," though most participants reject the idea of an afterlife or continued existence beyond death. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the belief that a clone, while genetically identical, would not embody the original individual's consciousness or identity.
  • #31
DaveC426913 said:
We're not sure what processes in the brain create the consciousness. But we're satisfied it is in the brain.

Exactly. We don't know for sure. That's why I thought that maybe if scientists would somehow manage to create a clone exactly like you after you die he would develop the same consciousness and it would sort of be like you? Or there is no such thing as different consciousness?

Also, since we're on the subject, when do we start to develop our conciousness? Do we know that?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
johnnya said:
Exactly. We don't know for sure. That's why I thought that maybe if scientists would somehow ...
In the realm of science, consciousness is in the brain. There is no evidence to the contrary and therefore no reason to go looking.
 
  • #33
OK, I can see this is going literally nowhere. I'm out.
 
  • #34
johnnya said:
Also, since we're on the subject, when do we start to develop our conciousness? Do we know that?

Thanks

This depends largely on how you define consciousness. This is a Philosophy of Mind topic, so it is probably best if you start that discussion as a new thread in our https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=112".

..I'm finding it pretty hard to explain what I'm thinking.

Then I think this thread is played out (for all the reasons given in the responses) until you want to give it a lot more thought and work out ways to articulate what you are proposing. At this point, I can only see some form of dualism as your escape hatch, and that's going to be hard to defend here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
253
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K