Would you date or marry a nonintellectual?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Honn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the importance of intellectual compatibility in romantic relationships. Participants express varied views on whether they would date or marry someone who is not capable of profound intellectual conversations but possesses common sense and general intelligence. Many argue that shared interests and the ability to engage in enjoyable conversations matter more than intellectual depth. Some emphasize that intellectual pursuits are just one aspect of life, and qualities like kindness and humor are equally, if not more, important. Others caution against elitism in defining "intellectual," noting that intelligence can manifest in various forms, including practical knowledge and life experience. The conversation also touches on the dynamics of relationships, suggesting that differences can create balance and that personal connections often transcend intellectual discussions. Overall, the consensus leans towards valuing emotional connection and compatibility over strict intellectual standards.
  • #61
Rick21383 said:
<Snip>
Idioms are often NOT logical. The phrase "Head over heels" makes no sense. It used to be "Heels over head" which makes more logical sense but that version isn't used anymore, right?

This "argument" is like something they'd be squabbling over at Reddit.
Interestingly, it seems one of the ways they caught the Unabomber was that he used the expression " You cannot eat your cake and then have it" , which is more precise than " You cannot have your cake and eat it": of course you can: you have it, you eat it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
EverGreen1231 said:
You should be able to talk with your partner. I would also caution against thinking someone 'intellectually simple' because they're not interested in mathematics, physics, or philosophy. The most intellectual people I know couldn't care less about any of those things.
I would imagine a true intellectual ( which I don't claim to be ) would be interested in knowledge for knowledge sake, and so would be interested in all areas. That is what I would associate to any reasonable definition of intellectual.
Still, I would think it comes down to , re the OP, finding someone who is willing to challenge themselves, their views and learn in the process. I think this is what the OP is referring to.
 
  • #63
I'll weigh in on this one, and by no definition am I considered an 'intellectual'. However, even being about average intelligence I'd say the chasm between two mindsets is there, and at times I did call my ex 'stupid', perhaps in the heat of an argument. She knew I meant it, and I knew how hurt it made her.. it sucks, but it doesn't usually work out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K