Would you date or marry a nonintellectual?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Honn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the question of whether individuals would date or marry someone who lacks the ability to engage in profound intellectual conversations. Participants express varied opinions, emphasizing that compatibility in interests and mutual respect are more critical than intellectual prowess. Many contributors highlight that a well-rounded relationship can thrive even without deep intellectual exchanges, as long as both partners share common interests and values. The conversation also touches on the importance of tolerance and understanding in relationships, suggesting that love transcends intellectual capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relationship dynamics and compatibility
  • Familiarity with concepts of intellectualism versus emotional intelligence
  • Knowledge of communication styles in romantic relationships
  • Awareness of societal perceptions of intelligence and elitism
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the impact of emotional intelligence on relationship satisfaction
  • Research effective communication strategies for couples with differing intellectual interests
  • Investigate the role of shared interests in fostering relationship compatibility
  • Examine societal attitudes towards intelligence and their effects on dating preferences
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for relationship counselors, individuals navigating romantic relationships, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of intellectual compatibility in partnerships.

  • #61
Rick21383 said:
<Snip>
Idioms are often NOT logical. The phrase "Head over heels" makes no sense. It used to be "Heels over head" which makes more logical sense but that version isn't used anymore, right?

This "argument" is like something they'd be squabbling over at Reddit.
Interestingly, it seems one of the ways they caught the Unabomber was that he used the expression " You cannot eat your cake and then have it" , which is more precise than " You cannot have your cake and eat it": of course you can: you have it, you eat it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
EverGreen1231 said:
You should be able to talk with your partner. I would also caution against thinking someone 'intellectually simple' because they're not interested in mathematics, physics, or philosophy. The most intellectual people I know couldn't care less about any of those things.
I would imagine a true intellectual ( which I don't claim to be ) would be interested in knowledge for knowledge sake, and so would be interested in all areas. That is what I would associate to any reasonable definition of intellectual.
Still, I would think it comes down to , re the OP, finding someone who is willing to challenge themselves, their views and learn in the process. I think this is what the OP is referring to.
 
  • #63
I'll weigh in on this one, and by no definition am I considered an 'intellectual'. However, even being about average intelligence I'd say the chasm between two mindsets is there, and at times I did call my ex 'stupid', perhaps in the heat of an argument. She knew I meant it, and I knew how hurt it made her.. it sucks, but it doesn't usually work out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K