Wouldn't the Geiger Counter be considered a measuring device in SC?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of the Geiger Counter as a measuring device in the context of Schrödinger's Cat and the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics. Participants assert that the Geiger Counter does indeed collapse the wave function of radioactive decay, leading to definitive states of the cat being either dead or alive. The conversation highlights the confusion surrounding the definition of a measuring device and its implications for superposition in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment
  • Familiarity with the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of wave function collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of quantum superposition
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Copenhagen Interpretation on quantum measurement
  • Explore the concept of wave function collapse in detail
  • Study the role of measuring devices in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate alternative interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as Many-Worlds
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to understand the implications of measurement in quantum theory.

esvion
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I think I am missing something in Schrödinger's Cat... Wouldn't the Geiger Counter cause the wave function of the decay to collapse because the Geiger Counter is interfering with the wave function? Would the Geiger Counter end the superposition of the particle? Does the problem lie with what the Copenhagen Interpretation defines as a "measuring device?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The state of the radioactive decay product is irrelavent; it is either emitted or not. Therefore the (pseudo) wavefunction of the entire system is an equal superposition of emission and non-emission corresponding to a dead or alive Cat respectively.

Yes, the geiger counter collapses this superposition into ultimately dead or alive states. Schrödinger's point is that, with the box closed the cat exists in a superposition of dead or alive states

It's easy to get confused about it. I've started to doubt what I've said now I've written it, that's the nature of it. I'd appreciate others input
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K