MHB Wrecking my brains on this Poisson Distribution question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging Poisson distribution problem involving incoming and outgoing calls. The user is trying to calculate the probability that incoming calls exceed outgoing calls, given at least three total calls. They are struggling to find the joint probability P(A∩B) due to the infinite possible cases. A suggestion is made to use the complementary probability approach, but clarification on defining the complementary event is needed. The correct answer to the problem is confirmed to be 0.705.
aznking1
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi. I normally can solve poisson distribution questions with ease. But this one question had me thinking for hours on end with no solution. It would be great if someone can help me.

QN:

The number of incoming calls per minute, X, to a telephone exchange has a Poisson distribution with mean 2. The number of outgoing calls per minute, Y, has an independent Poisson Distribution with mean 1.

In a randomly chosen 1-minute period, find the probability that there are more incoming calls than outgoing calls, given that there is a total of AT LEAST 3 calls.

My Working:

Let incoming calls > outgoing calls be A
Let a total of at least 3 calls be B

P(A|B) = P(A∩B)/P(B)

The part where i am stuck is finding P(A∩B), i.e, Probability of more incoming calls than outgoing calls AND a total of at least 3 calls. There are so many cases. Could be 3 incoming calls, 0 outgoing calls. Could be 4 incoming calls 1 outgoing calls. E.t.c. Then you take the sum of all these cases and it would be = P(A∩B).

But the number of cases are endless. So, just how am i supposed to calculate P(A∩B)? I am at my wits ends!

The answer is 0.705 if you manage to solve it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi aznking2,

Welcome to MHB! :)

Since this deals with Poisson random variables, there is no upper limit on the frequency of events so we can't calculate it that way. My guess is that we'll have to use the property the $P(A)=1-P(A')$ because we can calculate the opposite what of what we want more easily.

Can you please verify that .705 should be the answer?
 
Hi! Thanks for the quick reply.

I have thought of using P(A)=1−P(A′). However, it is not as straightforward as it seems. What exactly is your A' over here? A would be the case of more incoming calls than outgoing calls AND a total of of at least 3 calls. What would be A'? The phrasing eludes me and i have been trying to figure it out. If I figure it out I believe I would be able to solve it.

I do not think A' would be the case of more incoming calls than outgoing calls AND a total of less than 3 calls? So confusing.

And yes, I checked the answer of the book and it is indeed 0.705.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top