MHB Wrecking my brains on this Poisson Distribution question.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging Poisson distribution problem involving incoming and outgoing calls. The user is trying to calculate the probability that incoming calls exceed outgoing calls, given at least three total calls. They are struggling to find the joint probability P(A∩B) due to the infinite possible cases. A suggestion is made to use the complementary probability approach, but clarification on defining the complementary event is needed. The correct answer to the problem is confirmed to be 0.705.
aznking1
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi. I normally can solve poisson distribution questions with ease. But this one question had me thinking for hours on end with no solution. It would be great if someone can help me.

QN:

The number of incoming calls per minute, X, to a telephone exchange has a Poisson distribution with mean 2. The number of outgoing calls per minute, Y, has an independent Poisson Distribution with mean 1.

In a randomly chosen 1-minute period, find the probability that there are more incoming calls than outgoing calls, given that there is a total of AT LEAST 3 calls.

My Working:

Let incoming calls > outgoing calls be A
Let a total of at least 3 calls be B

P(A|B) = P(A∩B)/P(B)

The part where i am stuck is finding P(A∩B), i.e, Probability of more incoming calls than outgoing calls AND a total of at least 3 calls. There are so many cases. Could be 3 incoming calls, 0 outgoing calls. Could be 4 incoming calls 1 outgoing calls. E.t.c. Then you take the sum of all these cases and it would be = P(A∩B).

But the number of cases are endless. So, just how am i supposed to calculate P(A∩B)? I am at my wits ends!

The answer is 0.705 if you manage to solve it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi aznking2,

Welcome to MHB! :)

Since this deals with Poisson random variables, there is no upper limit on the frequency of events so we can't calculate it that way. My guess is that we'll have to use the property the $P(A)=1-P(A')$ because we can calculate the opposite what of what we want more easily.

Can you please verify that .705 should be the answer?
 
Hi! Thanks for the quick reply.

I have thought of using P(A)=1−P(A′). However, it is not as straightforward as it seems. What exactly is your A' over here? A would be the case of more incoming calls than outgoing calls AND a total of of at least 3 calls. What would be A'? The phrasing eludes me and i have been trying to figure it out. If I figure it out I believe I would be able to solve it.

I do not think A' would be the case of more incoming calls than outgoing calls AND a total of less than 3 calls? So confusing.

And yes, I checked the answer of the book and it is indeed 0.705.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K