Write parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around writing parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis in three-dimensional space. Participants are exploring the correct formulation of these equations and questioning their understanding of vector representation and line equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to define the parametric equations for the z-axis, with some suggesting forms like z = 1 + tz. Others question the validity of including variables in certain terms and explore vector representation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct forms of the equations, with some participants providing guidance on avoiding zero denominators and clarifying the implications of specific points on the z-axis. Multiple interpretations of the symmetric equations are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions of terms used in the equations, and there is a mention of homework constraints regarding the formulation of the equations without leading to contradictions.

lamerali
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Write parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis.

I'm not sure i am on the right track; here is my attempt to an answer.

[0, 0, z] where z can equal any number.

a = [0, 0, 1]
b = [0, 0, z]

Parametric equations

x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + tz

Symmetric equations
[tex]\frac{x - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{z - 1}{z}[/tex]
0 = 0 = -1

I'm not certain that my attempt to this question is correct; if anyone can guide me in the right direction if needed i would be grateful!
Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The parametric equations cannot contain the terms x,y,z on the RHS. So z = 1 + tz is not correct. Think in terms of vectors. We want to obtain the equation of a line for the z-axis in vector form: [tex]OP + t\vec{v}[/tex] where v is the direction of the line and OP any point on the line.

For the 2nd one, take notes of the values of x,y along the z-axis.
 
so would the parametric equation for z = a_z + tb_z

and for the second one since the values of x and y are always equal to zero on the z-axis; would the symmetric equations be:

x = y = z
0 = 0 = [tex]\frac{z - a_z}{b_z}[tex] <br /> Thanks[/tex][/tex]
 
What's a_z and b_z?
 
lamerali said:
Write parametric and symmetric equations for the z-axis.

I'm not sure i am on the right track; here is my attempt to an answer.

[0, 0, z] where z can equal any number.

a = [0, 0, 1]
b = [0, 0, z]
Two points on the z axis are [0, 0, 1] and [0, 0, 2] but certainly not "[0, 0, z]" because z is not a specific number.

Parametric equations

x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + tz

Symmetric equations
[tex]\frac{x - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{z - 1}{z}[/tex]
0 = 0 = -1

I'm not certain that my attempt to this question is correct; if anyone can guide me in the right direction if needed i would be grateful!
Thanks :)
 
ok so using the points [0,0,1] and [0,0,2] on the z-axis will i get the parametric and symmetric equations as follows:

parametric equations
x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + 2t

and the symmetric equations

[tex]\frac{x - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{z - 1}{2}[/tex]
0 = 0 = [tex]\frac{z - 1}{2}[/tex]

is this anywhere near correct?
Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well your parametric equations looks ok, though more complicated than necessary. The Cartesian equations (what you name "symmetric") doesn't appear correct.
 
lamerali said:
ok so using the points [0,0,1] and [0,0,2] on the z-axis will i get the parametric and symmetric equations as follows:

parametric equations
x = 0
y = 0
z = 1 + 2t
x= 0, y= 0, z= t describes exactly the same line.

and the symmetric equations

[tex]\frac{x - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y - 0}{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{z - 1}{2}[/tex]
0 = 0 = [tex]\frac{z - 1}{2}[/tex]
Well, first, (x-0)/0 and (y- 0)/0 are NOT equal to 0! Multiply the entire set of equations by 0.

is this anywhere near correct?
Thanks
the "symmetric equations" describing the z axis are x= y= 0.
 
Great i think i got it!
THANKS! :D
 
  • #10
Im struggling with this problem as well. I got parametric no problem, but I don't quite understand how to put the symmetric equation on paper. Also, I thought that symmetric equation only exists when the denominator does not equal to zero. How exactly would I write out the equation. Thanks
 
  • #11
The denominator of what, to be exact? There shouldn't be any denominator equating to 0.
 
  • #12
ugeous said:
Im struggling with this problem as well. I got parametric no problem, but I don't quite understand how to put the symmetric equation on paper. Also, I thought that symmetric equation only exists when the denominator does not equal to zero. How exactly would I write out the equation. Thanks

If in setting up the formulas "blindly", you get
[tex]\frac{x- 0}{0}= \frac{y- 0}{0}= \frac{z-1}{2}[/tex]
Then, because you can't have a "0" denominator, as Defennder said, you must have x-0= 0 and y- 0= 0. Of course, that gives you nothing for the "(z-1)/2" to be equal to so the equations are simply x= y= 0.
 
  • #13
Okay I see. Just to make it clear for me, say you had an example where you symmetric equation was (x-1)/2=(y-2)/3=(z-4)/0 would that mean the final equation is (x-1)/2=(y-2)/3=z?

Thanks again!
 
  • #14
No, why would you think so? That contradicts what Defennder and I just said! Because you cannot divide by 0, you must have z-4= 0 or z= 4. The equations for the line are (x-1)/2= (y-2)/3 and z= 4. Taking the joint value of (x-1)/2 and (y-2)/3 as t, that would correspond to parametric equations x= 1+ 2t, y= 2+ 3t, z= 4.
 
  • #15
Indeed it does! haha. I wrote that comment around 1am..just about time my brains stopped working haha. I understand what you mean. Thanks for you help guys! I can see clearly now!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K