Wrong Answer in Textbook for Collision Velocity Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mafagafo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
mafagafo
Messages
188
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


(Problem about a collision) (...). What then is their velocity in (a) unit-vector notation and as (b) magnitude and (c) angle.

I will not post the problem due to copyright issues and that it is absolutely pointless now.

The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to solve (a) and (b).
However, my answer for (c) differs from that of the textbook.
[tex]\text{a)} \;(2.67 \;\text{m/s})\hat{i}+(-3.00 \;\text{m/s})\hat{j}[/tex]
[tex]\text{b)} \;4.01 \;\text{m/s}[/tex]
[tex]\text{c)} \;\theta{} = \tan^{-1}\left(-\frac{3.00}{2.67}\right)=-0.845397=-48.4^{\circ{}}[/tex]

While the book provides +48.4° as the angle.

Am I correct? You can solve (c) from (a) and (b) [my answers are identical to those of the book].

It is from Fundamentals of Physics (Extended) - 9th ed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, without thinking too much about it, the vector given in (a) is in the fourth quadrant. The angle 48.4° is in the first quadrant. Your answer, however, is definitely in the fourth quadrant.
 
You are correct. The text should not have stated the answer as simply 48.4o.
If they had stated it as 48.4o below the positive x direction, then that would have been a good answer. But they didn't.
 
Yes, that's what I thought. I was pretty sure I was right, but as this book has presented very few mistakes already I thought I could be missing something.

Thank you guys for looking at it.