X/0 and a possible explanation of a solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pirwzwhomper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the concept of division by zero, specifically questioning if 6/0 could equal 0 by interpreting it as "six divided into zero equal parts." Participants clarify that this interpretation leads to inconsistencies, as multiplying any number by zero results in zero, which does not satisfy the equation 0*0=6. The consensus is that division by zero is undefined, as it contradicts fundamental mathematical principles. The conversation highlights the complexities and misconceptions surrounding the topic, emphasizing that a nonexisting value cannot yield a numerical result. Ultimately, the notion that 6/0 could equal 0 is rejected in favor of the established understanding that it remains undefined.
Pirwzwhomper
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
First, let me say that I have degrees or anything. I'm just out of hig school and took regular math the whole time I was there. I am not a mathematician or a numerologist.

But, I do have a theory.:wink:

Could we say that 6/3 is the same as saying "six divided into three equal parts"?

If so, would 6/0 be the same as saying "six divided into zero equal parts"?

Since a nonexisting thing cannot have a numerical value, wouldn't 6/0=0?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry it's just not that simple, you can define y in y = x/n as the number of sets containing n units that are needed to be added together to make up x.

Also for example n(x/n) = x, but now you have 0*(0) = x which doesn't fit with this for any value of x other than 0, or another example y = x/n as n tends to 0, y tends to infinity. Therefore x/0 is undefined.
 
a(b)=c so c/b=a

How does 3(0)=0? You cannot say that 0/0=3.

I was always told that any number times zero equalled zero.
 
That example was just to show you why having x/0 = 0 leads to inconsistencies, 0*0 = 0.
 
Hmmm. There has to be a better answer than undefined. Don't know why, but it just doesn't seem right. Maybe someday . . .
 
1)"Since a nonexisting thing cannot have a numerical value, wouldn't 6/0=0?"

Are you saying that 0 is not a number?

2)"I was always told that any number times zero equalled zero."

Yes, that's exactly WHY 6/0 cannot be 0: 0*0 is not equal to 6.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K