X^4 perturbative energy eigenvalues for harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the perturbative energy eigenvalues for a harmonic oscillator, specifically focusing on the evaluation of the expectation value of the operator \(x^4\) in quantum mechanics. Participants are examining discrepancies between their calculations and those presented in a textbook, raising questions about potential typographical errors in the equations provided.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are comparing their results for the expectation value \(\langle n | x^4 | n \rangle\) with those from a textbook, noting differences in the coefficients of \(n^2\). Some express uncertainty about whether these differences are due to typographical errors or miscalculations. There are also discussions about the validity of certain terms in the expansion of \((a + a^*)^4\) and the implications of discarding terms with unequal powers.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the correctness of the textbook's results and exploring the implications of their findings. While some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations, there is no explicit consensus on the correct form of the equations or the results, indicating ongoing exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of showing work to validate methods, and there is an acknowledgment of the challenges posed by potential errors in published solutions. The discussion also highlights the assumption that certain terms can be disregarded based on their contributions to integrals over symmetric limits.

PBTR3
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Compute first order correction matrix elements ##\langle \n | x^4 |m \rangle## for a one dimensional harmonic oscillator.
Relevant Equations
##\langle \n |x^4 |m \rangle = 2 \left( \frac hbar 2m\omega \right) \left( 3n^2 +2n +1 \right)##
\
The book(Schaum) says the above is the solution but after two hours of tedious checking and rechecking I get 2n^2 in place or the 3n^2. Am I missing something or is this just a typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PBTR3 said:
Relevant Equations:: ##\langle \n |x^4 |m \rangle = 2 \left( \frac hbar 2m\omega \right) \left( 3n^2 +2n +1 \right)##

Please correct the typographical errors on both sides of this equation.

I do find that ##\langle n |x^4 |n \rangle## is equal to a constant factor times ##\left( 2n^2 +2n +1 \right)## instead of ##\left(3n^2 +2n +1 \right)##. So, the textbook's result does not appear to be correct.

You haven't shown any work, so we cannot tell if your method of solution is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
TSny said:
Please correct the typographical errors on both sides of this equation.

I do find that ##\langle n |x^4 |n \rangle## is equal to a constant factor times ##\left( 2n^2 +2n +1 \right)## instead of ##\left(3n^2 +2n +1 \right)##. So, the textbook's result does not appear to be correct.

You haven't shown any work, so we cannot tell if your method of solution is correct.
 
(a + a*)^4= a^4+a^3a*+a^2a*a+a^2a*2+aa*a^2+aa*aa*+aa*^2a+aa*^3+a*a^3+a*a^2a*+
a*aa*a+a*aa^2+a*^2a^2+a*^2a^2+a*^2aa*+a*^3a+a*^4
then throw out all terms with unequal powers of a and a* which are 0.
##\langle n | a^2a*^2 | m \rangle=\langle n | (m+1) (m+2) | m \rangle##
Results for the rest are similar calculations to:
(m+1)(m+1), 2 m(m+1), m^2, and m(m-1)
Adding them all up = 6m^2 + 6m +3 or 3(2m^2 + 2m + 1) or since n=m
3(2n^2 + 2n + 1)
 
PBTR3 said:
(a + a*)^4= a^4+a^3a*+a^2a*a+a^2a*2+aa*a^2+aa*aa*+aa*^2a+aa*^3+a*a^3+a*a^2a*+
a*aa*a+a*aa^2+a*^2a^2+a*^2a^2+a*^2aa*+a*^3a+a*^4
then throw out all terms with unequal powers of a and a* which are 0.
##\langle n | a^2a*^2 | m \rangle=\langle n | (m+1) (m+2) | m \rangle##
Results for the rest are similar calculations to:
(m+1)(m+1), 2 m(m+1), m^2, and m(m-1)
Adding them all up = 6m^2 + 6m +3 or 3(2m^2 + 2m + 1) or since n=m
3(2n^2 + 2n + 1)
I am still trying to figure out how to fix that relevant equation post.
 
PBTR3 said:
(a + a*)^4= a^4+a^3a*+a^2a*a+a^2a*2+aa*a^2+aa*aa*+aa*^2a+aa*^3+a*a^3+a*a^2a*+
a*aa*a+a*aa^2+a*^2a^2+a*^2a^2+a*^2aa*+a*^3a+a*^4
OK. I think the term in boldface should be a*aa*^2, but that's probably just a typographical error.

PBTR3 said:
then throw out all terms with unequal powers of a and a* which are 0.
I assume the reason why you are throwing out these terms is that you are only considering the case where m = n.

PBTR3 said:
##\langle n | a^2a*^2 | m \rangle=\langle n | (m+1) (m+2) | m \rangle##
Results for the rest are similar calculations to:
(m+1)(m+1), 2 m(m+1), m^2, and m(m-1)
Adding them all up = 6m^2 + 6m +3 or 3(2m^2 + 2m + 1) or since n=m
3(2n^2 + 2n + 1)
Looks good.

Do you get ##\large \langle n | x^4| n \rangle = \frac{3}{4} \left( \frac{\hbar}{m \omega} \right)^2 (2n^2+2n+1)##?
 
TSny said:
OK. I think the term in boldface should be a*aa*^2, but that's probably just a typographical error.I assume the reason why you are throwing out these terms is that you are only considering the case where m = n.Looks good.

Do you get ##\large \langle n | x^4| n \rangle = \frac{3}{4} \left( \frac{\hbar}{m \omega} \right)^2 (2n^2+2n+1)##?
Yes! I am very much a novice at this and when books give an answer it usually helps greatly BUT when the answer published is wrong it causes much difficulty. Yes that is my typo. I am not perfect either. Also I throw out the odd powers because the integral they represent is zero from -infinity to plus infinity. Finally, all the *'s should be daggers but typing dagger every time seems wasteful. I have more confidence in my normalizations of a and a* now. Thank you very very much.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K