X intercept of Line Tangent to Curve

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the x-intercept of the line tangent to the parametric curve defined by x(t) = 3 + cos(∏t) and y(t) = t^2 + t + 1 at the point where t = 1. Participants are exploring the implications of derivatives and the tangent line's equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the derivative to find the slope of the tangent line and question the use of the slope-intercept form. There is confusion regarding the meaning of certain variables and notation, particularly concerning the parametric equations and the implications of the slope being undefined.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various interpretations of the tangent line's properties and questioning the correctness of each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the notation and the relationship between the tangent line's direction and its intercepts, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to find the x-intercept.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the tangent line's slope being undefined at certain points and the resulting impact on finding the x-intercept. There is also mention of the need to clarify the roles of different parameters in the equations being discussed.

mill
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the x-intercept of the line tangent to the curve x(t) = 3 + cos(∏t), y(t) = t^2 + t + 1, when t = 1?

Homework Equations



Derivative, y=mx+b

The Attempt at a Solution



To find the line tangent to the curve:

d/dt = <-∏sin(∏t), 2t+1>

at t=1 <-∏, 3>

dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx = -3/∏

y=(-3/∏)x+b

at t=1, <x,y>=<3,3>

y-3 = (-3/∏)(x-3)

y = -3x /∏ + 9/∏ +3

To find x-int. set y=0 so 0=-3x /∏ + 9/∏ +3

(-3 - 9/∏)(-∏/3)=x

The answer is x=2. I am not sure where I went wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mill said:

Homework Statement



What is the x-intercept of the line tangent to the curve x(t) = 3 + cos(∏t), y(t) = t^2 + t + 1, when t = 1?

Homework Equations



Derivative, y=mx+b

The Attempt at a Solution



d/dt = <-∏sin(∏t), 2t+1>

at t=1 <-∏, 3>

##\sin(\pi)=0##

dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx = -3/∏

What is ##u##? I think you mean ##\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{\frac{dy}{dt}}{\frac{dx}{dt}}##. But you could just use the parametric equation of the tangent line instead of using ##y=mx+b## form.

y=(-3/∏)x+b

at t=1, <x,y>=<3,3>

y-3 = (-3/∏)(x-3)

y = -3x /∏ + 9/∏ +3

To find x-int. set y=0 so 0=-3x /∏ + 9/∏ +3

(-3 - 9/∏)(-∏/3)=x

The answer is x=2. I am not sure where I went wrong.
 
LCKurtz said:
##\sin(\pi)=0##
What is ##u##? I think you mean ##\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{\frac{dy}{dt}}{\frac{dx}{dt}}##. But you could just use the parametric equation of the tangent line instead of using ##y=mx+b## form.

I see sin(∏)=0. Then that would mean dy/dx = 0.

By parametric equation of the tangent line do you mean r'(t)=x' + y'? To find int. I would set r'(1)=x' + y' and x'=-∏sin(t∏). t=1 so x'=-∏sin(∏)=0. y'=3

x'=sin(∏)=0 Inv sin (0)=0

r'(t)=3
 
mill said:
I see sin(∏)=0. Then that would mean dy/dx = 0.

No. The 0 is in the denominator, so the slope is undefined. All the more reason not to try using ##y=mx+b##.

By parametric equation of the tangent line do you mean r'(t)=x' + y'? To find int. I would set r'(1)=x' + y' and x'=-∏sin(t∏). t=1 so x'=-∏sin(∏)=0. y'=3

x'=sin(∏)=0 Inv sin (0)=0

r'(t)=3

That is really poor notation. ##r(t) = \langle x(t),y(t)\rangle## which is a vector, not a sum, and ##r'(t) = \langle x'(t),y'(t)\rangle## so ##r'(1) = \langle -\pi\sin\pi,3\rangle=\langle 0,3\rangle##. Since ##r(1) = \langle 2,3\rangle##, you have a point and direction vector for the tangent line when ##t=1##. What is the parametric equation of that tangent line?
 
LCKurtz said:
No. The 0 is in the denominator, so the slope is undefined. All the more reason not to try using ##y=mx+b##.



That is really poor notation. ##r(t) = \langle x(t),y(t)\rangle## which is a vector, not a sum, and ##r'(t) = \langle x'(t),y'(t)\rangle## so ##r'(1) = \langle -\pi\sin\pi,3\rangle=\langle 0,3\rangle##. Since ##r(1) = \langle 2,3\rangle##, you have a point and direction vector for the tangent line when ##t=1##. What is the parametric equation of that tangent line?

Would it be r(t)=<0, 3> + t<2,3> for the tangent? I am not sure how I can say the intercept is two from this equation. If I just look at x then x=2t which at t=1 is 2. Is that how it is found?
 
mill said:
Would it be r(t)=<0, 3> + t<2,3> for the tangent? I am not sure how I can say the intercept is two from this equation. If I just look at x then x=2t which at t=1 is 2. Is that how it is found?

Close but you have it backwards. <2,3> is the point and <0,3> is the direction vector. And it's best to use a different parameter and a different name so ##L(s) = \langle<x(s),y(s)\rangle=\langle 2,3\rangle + s\langle 0,3\rangle ##, where ##L## is the tangent line.

What value of ##s## makes ##y(s)=0##? What is ##x(s)## for that value.

Also, try not to lose sight of the forest for the trees. In the xy plane you have a line through (2,3) and its direction vector is <0,3>. What direction is that? What does the line look like?
 
LCKurtz said:
Close but you have it backwards. <2,3> is the point and <0,3> is the direction vector. And it's best to use a different parameter and a different name so ##L(s) = \langle<x(s),y(s)\rangle=\langle 2,3\rangle + s\langle 0,3\rangle ##, where ##L## is the tangent line.

What value of ##s## makes ##y(s)=0##? What is ##x(s)## for that value.

Also, try not to lose sight of the forest for the trees. In the xy plane you have a line through (2,3) and its direction vector is <0,3>. What direction is that? What does the line look like?

s would need to be 0. Would I necessarily need to find y in order to find the x-intercept?

The point (2,3) is going towards (0,3) so it is a line headed downwards along x?
 
mill said:
##s## would need to be 0.

Why?

Would I necessarily need to find y in order to find the x-intercept?

The x intercept on any graph is the x value when y = 0.

The point (2,3) is going towards (0,3) so it is a line headed downwards along x?

I don't know what "(2,3) going towards (0,3)" means nor what "headed downwards along x" means. The graph is a straight line. Surely you can describe it better than that. Plot a few points for various s.
 
LCKurtz said:
Why?



The x intercept on any graph is the x value when y = 0.

If I separate them into x=2+s(0) and y=3+s(3) then the only thing that makes y=0 is s=0?
 
  • #10
mill said:
If I separate them into x=2+s(0) and y=3+s(3) then the only thing that makes y=0 is s=0?

Are you serious?
 
  • #11
LCKurtz said:
Are you serious?

If I weren't, I wouldn't still be here eight hours later, sadly. Going off your equation L(s) =<x(s), y(s)> I assumed that I can simply look at x(s) since it is the x-intercept. s=0 so x=2. If I'm missing something, I don't know what it is.
 
  • #12
You have y = 3+3s and you are saying y = 0 when s = 0?

In this problem x happens to be constant so x=2 is the correct intercept even though you have the incorrect value of s for y=0. Can you describe what the line looks like?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K