MHB Yes, you are correct for both parts (A) and (B)!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Application Ball
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
A ball is thrown straight upward. Suppose that the height of the ball at time t is h = -16t^2 + 96t, where h is in feet and t is in seconds, with t = 0 corresponding to the instant that the ball is first tossed.

(A) How long does it take for the ball to drop?

(B) At what time is the height 80 feet? Question (B) has two answers. Why?

To answer part (A), do I set h = 0 and solve for t?

To answer part (B), do I set h = 80 and solve for t?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
To answer part (A), do I set h = 0 and solve for t?

Yes.

RTCNTC said:
To answer part (B), do I set h = 80 and solve for t?

Yes.
 
Good to know that I am right.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'Useless continued fraction for 1'

I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Calculating Ball Height and Time with Quadratic Formula
Replies
4
Views
1K
MHB Two Balls Thrown Vertical Upward
Replies
36
Views
7K
B Solving equations but getting an identity - what mistakes were made?
Replies
4
Views
808
MHB Application of quadratic function in kinematics
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Non-linear function with two unknown constants and one variable
Replies
7
Views
3K
MHB Correctness of Ball-Dropping Problem Answer
Replies
3
Views
3K
MHB Finding Time for a Kicked Ball
Replies
5
Views
3K
Two balls, dropped with a delay of ##\Delta t##, meet after rebound
Replies
34
Views
2K
MHB Jaden Harris' Velocity Ques. at Yahoo Answers
Replies
1
Views
3K
Distance-time graph of a ball throw vertically up from a fixed point
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top