Yet another radiation question

  • Thread starter Thread starter anonymous299792458
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of a charged particle under constant acceleration and its radiation properties. It highlights a contradiction between theoretical predictions and experimental observations regarding radiation emission. While it is established that a charged particle undergoing constant acceleration radiates, there is confusion regarding the radiation reaction force, which is said to be zero for constant acceleration. This leads to questions about Richard Feynman's statements on the topic, with participants clarifying that Feynman did not claim that constant acceleration results in no radiation. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of electromagnetic radiation from accelerated charges and the need for further clarification on the relationship between acceleration and radiation.
anonymous299792458
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
If the acceleration of the charge is constant, it radiates. However, the radiation reaction force, which depends only on the third and higher derivatives of x with respect to t, is 0. How is this explained? Didn't Feynman say that, in fact, in the case of constand acceleration, there's NO radiation? I have also read that it is an experimental fact that an accelerated charge radiates, even if the acceleration is constant. This question has been really bugging me for many months. I still haven't been able to find the answer. SO WHAT'S THE DEAL HERE??
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think you will find that a charged object undergoing constant acceleration will emit electromagnetic radiation. I don't remember Feynman saying otherwise :o) Which wouldn't matter anyway.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top