Young's Inequality alternative proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter grabthat123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
grabthat123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Young's Inequality can be restated as:

s^(x)t^(1-x)<=xs + (1-x)t where s,t>=0 and 0<x<1.

Basically I've been asked to prove this. I've been fiddling about with it for a couple of hours
to no avail.

I've tried to substitute t=e^u and s=e^v and then use partial differentiation w.r.t to v on st, but I'm not getting the required form. (I can't assume that exp is a convex function - otherwise it follows trivially)

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how to prove it yet, but my 2 cents would be:
[tex](\frac{s}{t})^x t \leq sx + (1-x)t[/tex]
[tex](\frac{s}{t})^x \leq \frac{s}{t} x + 1-x[/tex]
[tex]a^x \leq a x + 1 - x[/tex]
for [itex]a > 0[/itex]
This way, you have one variable less to worry about
 
Actually, think about it, consider the function
[tex]f(x)=ax + 1 - x - a^x[/tex]
[tex]f(0)=1-1=0[/tex]
[tex]f(1) = a + 1 - 1 - a = 0[/tex]
[tex]f'(x_0)= a - 1 - \ln a a^{x_0} = 0[/tex]
[tex]a^{x_0} = \frac{a - 1}{\ln a}[/tex]
Now assume [itex]a>1[/itex]. Then if you can show that the rhs is smaller than a, you have shown that [itex]0 < x_0 < 1[/itex]. so
[tex]a-1 < \ln a a[/tex]
[tex]1 - \frac{1}{a} < \ln a[/tex]
I think you can find this property somewhere.
[tex]f''(x)=- (\ln a) ^2 a^{x}[/tex] which is smaller than 0 everywhere, particularly at [itex]x_0[/itex].
So for a > 1 you have already proven everything. For a < 1, you have to show that the rhs is larger than a. Let [itex]a = 1/b[/itex] with [itex]b > 1[/itex].
[tex]\frac{\frac{1}{b}-1}{\ln \frac{1}{b}} > \frac{1}{b}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\frac{1}{b}-1}{-\ln b} > \frac{1}{b}[/tex]
[tex]1 - b < \ln b[/tex]
since b > 1, this should hold trivially.
Anyhow, it all comes down to [itex]1 - \frac{1}{a} < \ln a[/itex]. You should look it up (and make sure I haven't made any mistakes) lol
 
[tex]f(a)=\ln a a +1 - a \geq 0[/tex]
For [itex]a = 1[/itex] you have f(1)=0, so it's correct.
[tex]f'(a)= \frac{a}{a} + \ln a - 1 = \ln a[/tex]
which is always greater than 0, so you have a monotonically growing function.