YouTube Classics: Watch & Learn Kids

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Youtube
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1,796 replies · 360K views
FredGarvin said:
If this isn't a classic it soon will be...

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="[URL]http://www.youtube.com/v/RJlPEHL85Ig&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RJlPEHL85Ig&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

:bugeye:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sshPiEUGyZ8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sshPiEUGyZ8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2rW1alVv8
 
Crash test between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air with both going 40 mph (64 km/h) and the vehicles collide offset, driver side to driver side. This is the same crash configuration represented by the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset barrier test, which is used to rate the frontal crash performance of new cars.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
Crash test between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air with both going 40 mph (64 km/h) and the vehicles collide offset, driver side to driver side. This is the same crash configuration represented by the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset barrier test, which is used to rate the frontal crash performance of new cars.




They even included fuzzy dice hanging from the rear view in the Bel Air...:cool:.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDuQOgItebM
 
Don't do this at home or on the streets or anywhere else for that matter - unless you're really good!

Inspired. Danny MacAskill

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like this video. My friend made it, he is an aspiring director. I play a short part in it also. It's a spoof on those old 1970's movie trailers for action movies. With corny lines and all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
Crash test between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air with both going 40 mph (64 km/h) and the vehicles collide offset, driver side to driver side. This is the same crash configuration represented by the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset barrier test, which is used to rate the frontal crash performance of new cars.




I'm thinking the driver of the Malibu would fair better. I'm surprised how badly the passenger compartment of the Bel-Air is distorted considering how big it is (plus bouncing off all of those hard parts in the interior can't be too good even if the passenger compartment maintained its shape).

Note that neither car goes backward. The battle of momentum is a draw and the cars rotate around each other.

Here's some tests between mini/micro cars and mid-size cars. Even if they designed a stronger passenger compartment, it's tough to get around the fact that the driver that was once going 40 mph forward is suddenly going backward.

Micro/Mini crash tests
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Muppet Bohemian Rhapsody. These guys made my night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgbNymZ7vqY
 
GeorginaS said:
Muppet Bohemian Rhapsody. These guys made my night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgbNymZ7vqY

Wow. I think Freddy and Jim would both approve.

Thank's G!
 
My favorite commercial:



Yeah, they take a little dramatic license there. The spacecraft and uniforms look more like they came from the art department than the engineering section and it obviously takes more than 30 seconds to maneuver a satellite out of the way of debris.

And, the JSpOC monitors objects in space - the satellites are actually controlled from various other places, but you have to take some liberties to compress that scenario into 30 seconds.

In fact, the real process usually takes a few weeks since you're usually avoiding dead debris affected only by natural forces and you want to incorporate the collision avoidance maneuvers into normal station keeping maneuvers to conserve fuel. But, the overall concept is accurate, even if not quite as exciting as the commercial.

They filimed the commercial at a real Air Force facility and used Air Force personnel instead of actors (but they did such a good job you probably can't tell they're not professional actors :smile:). One of the people I work with is young enough that she's actually worked with about half the people in the commercial.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Borek said:
Not for kids:
I had to watch it two times before I got it! So I guess I am half a kid :)
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C3jBMooa0TM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C3jBMooa0TM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhGlqsASNxo
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4oAB83Z1ydE&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4oAB83Z1ydE&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ivan Seeking said:
Watch and learn kids. :biggrin:
The solution is definitely not condoms; http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121390799/abstract". The solution is: Grow up, be a man, and discipline your child.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
marlon said:
"je veux les bonbons" :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

marlon
http://www.oddcast.com/demos/tts/tts_tran_example.php?clients
Yes, I want candy.
 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyYilOhGw40
 
lisab said:
Copy just the letter-number code (after the v= ) from the Youtube video, and paste it between https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[ /YOUTUBE]. It's easier if you use the TV icon.
Yes, women want a man with resources. Men want novelty.