Yucca Mountain viability for nuclear waste

  • Thread starter Thread starter caldweab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
32 replies · 13K views
nikkkom said:
Won't Hanford reprocessing plant be able to process civilian spent fuel after it's done with military waste?

My understanding of the Hanford complex is that the reprocessors were shut down in the 70's and were never reopened. And they are now on the long list of D&D (decimation & destruction) at the sight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Argentum Vulpes said:
My understanding of the Hanford complex is that the reprocessors were shut down in the 70's and were never reopened. And they are now on the long list of D&D (decimation & destruction) at the sight.

I'm talking about this:

http://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/wtp

When finished, it's supposed to be able to vitrify the nasty stuff.
I suppose the end result (steel containers with glass) will be stored in Hanford too.

Add a front-end PUREX stage to it and it's a complete reprocessing solution.
 
nikkkom said:
I'm talking about this:

http://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/wtp

When finished, it's supposed to be able to vitrify the nasty stuff.
I suppose the end result (steel containers with glass) will be stored in Hanford too.

Add a front-end PUREX stage to it and it's a complete reprocessing solution.

Yes if a PUREX stage were added then it could be the restart of reprocessing in the US. However the project you have linked to is only a way to deal with the leftovers from the PUREX process, with no plans that I can find on turning or adding a plant to make it into reprocessing plant. So I'm still standing by my earlier analysis that reprocessing is dead and cold in the ground when it comes to the US.