Yukawa Potential Homework: Sketch, Schrodinger Eq & Perturbation Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Yukawa potential, defined as Vγ(r) = -q2/(4πε0r)e-γr, which describes a screened Coulomb potential. Participants seek assistance with sketching the potential, formulating the radial Schrödinger equation, and applying first-order perturbation theory to estimate the energy shift of the hydrogen atom's ground state. Key insights include using gnuplot for graphing and the importance of integrating the potential with the hydrogen atom's ground state wavefunction for accurate energy calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Yukawa potential and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with the radial Schrödinger equation in spherical coordinates
  • Knowledge of first-order perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Experience with integration techniques, particularly in spherical coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to graph functions using gnuplot for visualizing potentials
  • Study the derivation of the radial Schrödinger equation for central potentials
  • Explore first-order perturbation theory applications in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the behavior of exponential functions in integrals for quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying atomic physics, potential theory, and perturbation methods. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the Yukawa potential and its implications in quantum systems.

  • #31
Like I said, stop doing it in pieces. You need to write out the whole thing with every constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
\int \psi^{\dagger}(r) V(r) \psi(r) r^2 dr = \int_{0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{-1}{\pi r a^{3}}\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r^{2}}dr = \left[\left(\frac{2r^{2}}{\pi a^{3}}\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r^{2}}\right]^{\infty}_{0}
 
  • #33
\int \psi^{\dagger}(r) V(r) \psi(r) r^2 dr = \int_{0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{-1}{\pi r a^{3}}\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r^{2}}dr = <br /> <br /> \left[\left(\frac{-1}{\pi r a^{3}}\right)\left(-\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)\left(2r\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r^{2}}\right]^{\infty}_{0}<br /> <br /> =\left[\left(\frac{2r^{2}}{\pi a^{3}}\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)r^{2}}\right]^{\infty}_{0}

.. but then I can't see where I've gone wrong, because obviously inputting limits will give 0 as the result. :confused:
 
  • #34
Got a bit confused now, this is what I have noted down in addition to the previous post (I think this is more correct):

\left&lt;\psi V_{\gamma}(r)\psi\right&gt; = \int^{\infty}_{0}\left[-\left(\frac{1}{\pi r a^{3}}\right)e^{-r\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)}\right]dr

so then get this:

=\left[\frac{1}{\pi a^{3}}\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)e^{-r\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)}\right]^{\infty}_{0}

and after input limits:

=\frac{1}{\pi a^{3}}\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)

.. any good?
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Hart said:
.. still can't figure out how to do part 3 of this question :frown:

This is as far as I've got:

E_{n}^{1} = E_{0}&#039; - E_{0} \approx \left&lt; \psi_{n}^{0}|\omega|\psi_{n}^{0}\right&gt;

so..

E_{n}^{1} = E_{0}&#039; - E_{0} \approx \left&lt; \psi_{n}^{0}|V_{\gamma}-V_{0}|\psi_{n}^{0}\right&gt;

.. and then I need to do some sort of Taylor expansion thing with the perturbation?!

Really don't get this


Pertubation expansion is done by so:

E_n=\sum^{\infty}_{j=0} \lambda^{j}E^{j}_{n}

Its wave function is expanded in terms given by:

|\psi&gt;=\sum^{\infty}_{j=0} \lambda^{j}|\psi_{n}&gt;

This all works when dealing with Eigenvalues dealing with H=H_{o}+ \lambda H where \lambdais the expansion parameter.
 
  • #36
Hart said:
Got a bit confused now, this is what I have noted down in addition to the previous post (I think this is more correct):

\left&lt;\psi V_{\gamma}(r)\psi\right&gt; = \int^{\infty}_{0}\left[-\left(\frac{1}{\pi r a^{3}}\right)e^{-r\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)}\right]dr

so then get this:

=\left[\frac{1}{\pi a^{3}}\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)e^{-r\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)}\right]^{\infty}_{0}

and after input limits:

=\frac{1}{\pi a^{3}}\left(\frac{2}{a}-\gamma\right)

.. any good?

You are still leaving out constants, like charge. Also, you completely changed the solution. Not sure what happened but now things are worse.

Go back and carefully step through everything on paper that way you can keep track of everything.
 
  • #37
These are my exact full calculations:

V_{\gamma}(r) = -\left(\frac{q^{2}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}r}\right)e^{-\gamma r}

\left&lt;\psi(r)|V_{\gamma}(r)|\psi(r)\right&gt; = \left&lt;\psi(r)|-\left(\frac{q^{2}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}r}\right)e^{-\gamma r}|\psi(r)\right&gt; = 4\pi \int^{\infty}_{0}\psi(r)V_{\gamma}(r)\psi(r)r^{2}dr

=\left(-\frac{4\pi q^{2}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\right)\int^{\infty}_{0}r e^{-\gamma r}\psi(r)\psi(r) dr

=\left(-\frac{q^{2}}{\epsilon_{0}\pi a^{3}}\right)\int^{\infty}_{0}r e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r} dr

=\left(-\frac{q^{2}}{\epsilon_{0}\pi a^{3}}\right)\left(-\frac{4 \pi}{\frac{2}{a}+\gamma}\right)

=\frac{4 q^{2}}{\epsilon_{0}a^{3}\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)}

.. I'm hoping this is along the right lines, though I can't see that I've missed anything else now, but I'm unsure what I need to do further now.
 
Last edited:
  • #38
The solution to the integral in the 2nd to last line is incorrect. Scroll back a page and see how we solved it.
 
  • #39
Hart said:
so..

\int_{0}^{\infty} r e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r}dr = \left(\left(-\frac{r}{\alpha}-\frac{1}{\alpha^{2}}\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r}\right)\right|^{\infty}_{0}

??

And then inputting the limits:

\implies = \left(0-\frac{1}{\alpha^{2}}\right)

??

Therefore:

\implies = \left(-\frac{4 \pi }{\alpha^{2}}\right)

.. better? :wink:

nickjer said:
Yes, now put back in all the constants. And it should look very similar to the ground state energy of a hydrogen atom using the coulomb potential.

.. that's what I've used, obviously with the value of \alpha substituted.

.. OH wait, it's \alpha^{2} not \alpha, so then the result should be:

=\frac{4 q^{2}}{\epsilon_{0}a^{3}\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)^{2}}

correct now?
 
  • #40
Then where did the 4*pi come from since you used it in line 2 already. And why isn't the denominator squared?
 
  • #41
Also, once you finished this, you will need to do the same for the coulomb potential. Since you need to do

&lt;\psi_0|V_\lambda-V|\psi_0&gt;=&lt;\psi_0|V_\lambda|\psi_0&gt;-&lt;\psi_0|V|\psi_0&gt;

But that will be much easier to solve, since we solved it basically already. You would replace \alpha from your previous integral with just 2/a_0
 
  • #42
so it should be:

\left&lt;\psi(r)|V_{\gamma}(r)|\psi(r)\right&gt; = \left&lt;\psi(r)|-\left(\frac{q^{2}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}r}\right)e^{-\gamma r}|\psi(r)\right&gt; =\left(-\frac{q^{2}}{\epsilon_{0}\pi a^{3}}\right)\left(-\frac{1}{\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma}\right)^{2}\right)

better?
 
  • #43
Hart said:
.. of course! what a silly mistake there!

so..

\int_{0}^{\infty} r e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r}dr = \left(\left(-\frac{r}{\alpha}-\frac{1}{\alpha^{2}}\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r}\right)\right|^{\infty}_{0}

??

And then inputting the limits:

\implies = \left(0-\frac{1}{\alpha^{2}}\right)

??

Therefore:

\implies = \left(-\frac{4 \pi }{\alpha^{2}}\right)

.. better? :wink:

Forgot to mention, the solution is positive. You subtract the last limit of r=0, making it positive.
 
  • #44
erm.. yep. so should be:

\int_{0}^{\infty} r e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r}dr = \left(\left(\frac{r}{\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)}-\frac{1}{\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)^{2}}\right)e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)r}\right)\right|^{\infty}_{0} = \frac{4\pi}{\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma\right)^{2}}

right?

but that doesn't help simplify this:

\left&lt;\psi(r)|V_{\gamma}(r)|\psi(r)\right&gt; = \left&lt;\psi(r)|-\left(\frac{q^{2}}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}r}\right)e^{-\gamma r}|\psi(r)\right&gt; =\left(-\frac{q^{2}}{\epsilon_{0}\pi a^{3}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{2}{a}+\gamma}\right)^{2}\right)

does it?
 
  • #45
There is no 4*Pi in the first line, since you already pulled out the angular integrals. The last line is now correct. To simplify it, I would recommend pulling out the 2/a from the denominator so it more resembles the ground state of the coulomb potential.

Now go back and solve this again for just the coulomb potential. You will notice a similarity.
 
  • #46
um, don't get how I can rearrange that how you said :confused:

.. also, so to get the final answer I need also caclulate this:

\int_{0}^{\infty} r e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a_{0}}\right)r}dr = \left(\left(-\frac{a_{0}r}{2}-\frac{a_{0}^{2}}{4}\right)e^{-\left(\frac{a_{0}}{2}\right)r}\right)\right|^{\infty}_{0} = \left(\frac{a_{0}r}{2}+\frac{a_{0}^{2}}{4}\right)

Then take this away from what we're currently working out, so that the final answer is:

&lt;\psi_0|V_\lambda-V|\psi_0&gt;=&lt;\psi_0|V_\lambda|\psi_0&gt;-&lt;\psi_0|V|\psi_0&gt;

correct??
 
  • #47
That is correct (in theory). But you solved the integral wrong. It is the exact same integral as before but without the gamma.
 
  • #48
..huh?
 
  • #49
nickjer said:
You have:

\int r e^{-\alpha r}dr

Use,
r = u
e^{-\alpha r} dr = dv

That gives,
dr = du
\frac{-1}{\alpha} e^{-\alpha r} = v

Use,
\int u dv = uv - \int v du
\int r e^{-\alpha r}dr = \frac{-r}{\alpha} e^{-\alpha r}+\int \frac{1}{\alpha} e^{-\alpha r}dr<br /> = \frac{-r}{\alpha} e^{-\alpha r}-\frac{1}{\alpha^2}e^{-\alpha r}

I left out the bounds for simplicity, but you should include them. I also used alpha to make my work easier.

The same as this but now alpha = 2/a and not 2/a+gamma.
 
  • #50
.. so you mean for the second part it will be this:

\int_{0}^{\infty} r e^{-\left(\frac{2}{a}\right)r}dr = \left(\frac{r}{\left(\frac{2}{a}\right)}-\frac{1}{\left(\frac{2}{a})^{2}}\right)\right|^{\infty}_{0} = \frac{4\pi}{\left(\frac{2}{a}\right)^{2}} = \pi a^{2}

??

Going back to the first bit, how do I rearrange that result better then? I didn't get what you said about pulling the \frac{2}{a} term out?!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K