Zero Potential In Uniform Electric Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the behavior of charged objects in a uniform electric field, specifically addressing the choice of zero voltage reference points and the application of Gauss' Law to charged plates. The magnitude of the electric field generated by a charged plane is given by the formula (SCD) / (2 * Permittivity constant), where SCD represents surface charge density. It is established that the electric field remains constant at all points in front of an infinitely large charged plane. Additionally, the discussion clarifies that a charged sphere will experience a horizontal force when placed in this field, leading to a stable angle of displacement from the vertical.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential difference
  • Familiarity with Gauss' Law and its applications
  • Knowledge of surface charge density (SCD) and permittivity constant
  • Basic concepts of electric forces and potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about the behavior of charged plates and their electric fields
  • Explore the calculation of electric potential energy for continuous charge distributions
  • Investigate the effects of varying distances in electric fields and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and the behavior of charged objects in electric fields.

daletaylor
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I actually have two questions...

When dealing with a uniform electric field, where do we normally chose to 0V to be?

Also, if we have a charged plate, we can treat it as a charged plane to use Gauss' Law right? Now, if we figure out the magnitude of the field created by that plane, we end up with:

(SCD)/ 2(Permittivity constant)

where (SCD) is the surface charge density of the plane.

Now because the magnitude of this field does not depend on the distance from the plane, the field has the same magnitude at every point in front of it, right?

Do does this mean that if I hung a charged sphere from the ceiling and took a metal plate and put sufficient charge on it, and pointed it at the sphere it would move to a point where is was hanging with a certain angle to the vertical? And furthermore it would stay at that same angle no matter how far I went with the plate?

Thanks,
Dale
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daletaylor said:
Hi,

I actually have two questions...

When dealing with a uniform electric field, where do we normally chose to 0V to be?
'Volts' are units of measure of the potential difference between two points. There is no such thing as a point of 0V except in relation to another point.

Also, if we have a charged plate, we can treat it as a charged plane to use Gauss' Law right? Now, if we figure out the magnitude of the field created by that plane, we end up with:

(SCD)/ 2(Permittivity constant)

where (SCD) is the surface charge density of the plane.

Now because the magnitude of this field does not depend on the distance from the plane, the field has the same magnitude at every point in front of it, right?
Not unless it is an infinitely large plane.

Do does this mean that if I hung a charged sphere from the ceiling and took a metal plate and put sufficient charge on it, and pointed it at the sphere it would move to a point where is was hanging with a certain angle to the vertical? And furthermore it would stay at that same angle no matter how far I went with the plate?
If the sphere is much smaller than the plane, it will see a uniform electric field. Assuming that if the field is turned off the sphere hangs vertically, when the field is turned on it would experience a horizontal force equal to qE. This would cause it to swing horizontally and vertically until the forces of gravity, tension and electricity balanced (or until the string breaks). To then move the plate relative to the charge, you would have to do work against the electrical force between the plate and charge, so the electrical energy of the sphere relative to the plate would change. But the force on the charge would not change.

AM
 
Thank you very much!

Just out of curiosity, how would one calculate the electrical energy between the plane and the sphere?

There is a formula for the potential energy,

U = [(Ke) * q1 * q2] / r

but this seems to be only for point charges. How would you do this for a plane of charges?

Thanks,
Dale
 
The potential of a single plane is given by basically repeating the point charge equation and leads to the following intergral;

\int^{a}_{-b} \frac{kdq}{r}

The potential on the surface of a sphere is identical to that of a point charge.

-Hoot:smile:

[edit] latex still isn't working so I've included an image from hyperphysics;
plin.gif


If you want more information hyperphysics is an excellent resource;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elepot.html#c1
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
790
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K