Zero Potential In Uniform Electric Field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around concepts related to electric fields, specifically uniform electric fields and the behavior of charged objects in such fields. The original poster raises questions about the reference point for electric potential, the application of Gauss' Law to charged plates, and the implications of these concepts for the motion of a charged sphere in the presence of a charged plate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore where to define the zero potential in a uniform electric field and discuss the implications of treating a charged plate as a charged plane. Questions arise regarding the uniformity of the electric field and the behavior of a charged sphere in relation to a charged plate.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the nature of electric fields and the conditions under which they remain uniform. There is a recognition of the complexities involved in calculating electric potential energy between a charged plane and a sphere, with references to existing formulas and integrals. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the behavior of the electric field may depend on the size of the charged objects involved, and there is an acknowledgment of the limitations of certain equations when applied to non-point charges. The discussion also hints at the need for further clarification on the relationship between electric potential and distance in the context of charged planes.

daletaylor
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I actually have two questions...

When dealing with a uniform electric field, where do we normally chose to 0V to be?

Also, if we have a charged plate, we can treat it as a charged plane to use Gauss' Law right? Now, if we figure out the magnitude of the field created by that plane, we end up with:

(SCD)/ 2(Permittivity constant)

where (SCD) is the surface charge density of the plane.

Now because the magnitude of this field does not depend on the distance from the plane, the field has the same magnitude at every point in front of it, right?

Do does this mean that if I hung a charged sphere from the ceiling and took a metal plate and put sufficient charge on it, and pointed it at the sphere it would move to a point where is was hanging with a certain angle to the vertical? And furthermore it would stay at that same angle no matter how far I went with the plate?

Thanks,
Dale
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daletaylor said:
Hi,

I actually have two questions...

When dealing with a uniform electric field, where do we normally chose to 0V to be?
'Volts' are units of measure of the potential difference between two points. There is no such thing as a point of 0V except in relation to another point.

Also, if we have a charged plate, we can treat it as a charged plane to use Gauss' Law right? Now, if we figure out the magnitude of the field created by that plane, we end up with:

(SCD)/ 2(Permittivity constant)

where (SCD) is the surface charge density of the plane.

Now because the magnitude of this field does not depend on the distance from the plane, the field has the same magnitude at every point in front of it, right?
Not unless it is an infinitely large plane.

Do does this mean that if I hung a charged sphere from the ceiling and took a metal plate and put sufficient charge on it, and pointed it at the sphere it would move to a point where is was hanging with a certain angle to the vertical? And furthermore it would stay at that same angle no matter how far I went with the plate?
If the sphere is much smaller than the plane, it will see a uniform electric field. Assuming that if the field is turned off the sphere hangs vertically, when the field is turned on it would experience a horizontal force equal to qE. This would cause it to swing horizontally and vertically until the forces of gravity, tension and electricity balanced (or until the string breaks). To then move the plate relative to the charge, you would have to do work against the electrical force between the plate and charge, so the electrical energy of the sphere relative to the plate would change. But the force on the charge would not change.

AM
 
Thank you very much!

Just out of curiosity, how would one calculate the electrical energy between the plane and the sphere?

There is a formula for the potential energy,

U = [(Ke) * q1 * q2] / r

but this seems to be only for point charges. How would you do this for a plane of charges?

Thanks,
Dale
 
The potential of a single plane is given by basically repeating the point charge equation and leads to the following intergral;

[tex]\int^{a}_{-b} \frac{kdq}{r}[/tex]

The potential on the surface of a sphere is identical to that of a point charge.

-Hoot:smile:

[edit] latex still isn't working so I've included an image from hyperphysics;
plin.gif


If you want more information hyperphysics is an excellent resource;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elepot.html#c1
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K