Zeros, x intercepts, passing through x axis or just touching it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter priceofcarrot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between zeros and x-intercepts in the context of the function f(x) = (x - 2)((x + 1)^2)(x - 4). It establishes that zeros, such as x = -1, can exist where the graph touches the x-axis without crossing it, indicating that not all zeros result in x-intercepts that cross the axis. The terms "bouncing off" and "touching" are used to describe this behavior, confirming that x-intercepts are points on the x-axis corresponding to zeros of the function, regardless of whether the graph crosses the axis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their graphs
  • Familiarity with the concept of zeros of a function
  • Knowledge of x-intercepts and their significance in graphing
  • Basic grasp of the behavior of quadratic factors in polynomial equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the behavior of polynomial functions at their zeros
  • Learn about the implications of multiplicity in polynomial roots
  • Explore graphical representations of functions with varying degrees
  • Investigate the relationship between zeros and intercepts in rational functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, educators teaching polynomial functions, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of graph behavior related to zeros and x-intercepts.

priceofcarrot
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


So this isn't a specific question, I'm just having trouble with my definitions.

In my book for f(x) = (x - 2) ((x + 1)^2) (x-4) it says that the zeros are at x = 2, -1, 4.

On the page it shows that the graph doesn't cross the x-axis at -1. Does that mean that some zeros cross the x-axis and that some don't? Does -1 count as a zero?

Are all x intercepts zeros? Meaning that x intercepts don't necessarily cross the x-axis either? My book refers to the graph 'bouncing off' at points where the graph doesn't go through a point on the x-axis (where y= 0). So if I'm asked for an x intercept, I can give a value for x where the line only just touches x on the x-axis and doesn't also go through and past x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
priceofcarrot said:
So this isn't a specific question, I'm just having trouble with my definitions.

In my book for f(x) = (x - 2) ((x + 1)^2) (x-4) it says that the zeros are at x = 2, -1, 4.

On the page it shows that the graph doesn't cross the x-axis at -1. Does that mean that some zeros cross the x-axis and that some don't? Does -1 count as a zero?
The zeroes don't cross the axis - they are just numbers on the axis. At a zero, a curve can cross or just touch the x-axis. A zero of a function is a number c such that f(c) = 0. Since f(-1) = 0 for your function, then -1 is a zero.
priceofcarrot said:
Are all x intercepts zeros? Meaning that x intercepts don't necessarily cross the x-axis either? My book refers to the graph 'bouncing off' at points where the graph doesn't go through a point on the x-axis (where y= 0).
All x-intercepts of a graph occur at the zeroes of the function. X intercepts are just points on the x-axis, so they don't cross it.
priceofcarrot said:
So if I'm asked for an x intercept, I can give a value for x where the line only just touches x on the x-axis and doesn't also go through and past x?

Yes.
 
Thanks for another great reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K