Zeta function in the critical strip

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheOogy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Zeta function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on calculating values of the Riemann zeta function within the critical strip (0 < Re(s) < 1). Participants explore various methods and representations for evaluating the zeta function, particularly in light of its series definition and functional equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about calculating the zeta function in the critical strip, noting limitations of the series and functional equation for values outside the region of convergence.
  • Another suggests looking into various representations available online, though they express uncertainty about their usefulness.
  • A participant proposes using the Dirichlet eta function relation as a potential method.
  • Questions arise about expressing the eta function as a product of primes and the feasibility of calculating values in the critical strip without an alternating series.
  • One participant mentions using the relation to zeta and its Euler product but expresses uncertainty regarding convergence.
  • Another provides an integral representation involving the eta and gamma functions, valid for Re(s) > 0, and suggests using the zeta relation again.
  • A participant requests the zeta-gamma integral form after attempting the Euler product without success.
  • One response directs participants to online resources for more information but warns about the limitations of the original forms of the functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for calculating the zeta function in the critical strip, with multiple competing approaches and expressions discussed. Uncertainty remains regarding the convergence of certain methods.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the region of convergence for various representations and the need for familiarity with complex analysis to fully understand the discussed methods.

TheOogy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
how do i calculate values of the riemann zeta function in the critical strip? because if you only know zeta as a series:

<br /> \zeta(s) = \sum 1/n^s <br />

and the functional equation

<br /> \zeta(s) = 2^s\pi^{s-1}\sin\left(\frac{\pi s}{2}\right)\Gamma(1-s)\zeta(1-s) \! <br />

you can only calculate values that have real part bigger then 1 or smaller then 0.
i know i can use a math software to calculate it but i want to understand the process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!,
there are many other representations (wikipedia or www.mathworld.com) but maybe non of them will be enough helpfull.
 
Use the dirichlet eta function relation.
 
can we express the eta function as a product of primes?
 
in 0< re s <1 ?
 
yes.
 
or, is there a way to calculate values in the critical strip without using an alternating series?
 
Well, you can use the relation to zeta and use its euler product. But I'm not sure as far as the convergence goes.

edit1: And yes, you can (amongst other ways) express \eta(s)\Gamma(s) as an integral,

\eta(s)\Gamma(s)=\int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x+1}\mathrm{d}x, valid for re s > 0.

and then use the zeta relation again.

You could also use the \zeta(s)\Gamma(s) integral form, and deform the contour as riemann originally did.
 
Last edited:
i tried using the euler product but it didn't work, but thanks for the eta-gamma integral, can you show me the zeta-gamma integral two and save me the search?
 
  • #10
Just go to almost any gamma or zeta function online encyclopedia site for more info, but beware the original form only works for re s > 1 (the eta form works for re s>0), if you are not somewhat familiar with complex analysis you won't get much of it.

The eta gamma + relation gives,

\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{(1-2^{1-s})\Gamma(s)}\int_0^\infty \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x+1}\mathrm{d}x, edit(\Re s &gt; 0, s \not= 1)
 
  • #11
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K