Reference or explanation of zeta mellin transform in critical strip

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the zeta function's representation in the critical strip as outlined in Apostol's "Introduction to Analytic Number Theory." Specifically, it references Theorem 3.2(b), which establishes the limit representation of the zeta function. The conversation also highlights the Mellin transform integral representation of the zeta function, as discussed by mathematician Petersen. The user sought clarification on the justification for this representation and ultimately found a relevant resource to support their inquiry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Riemann zeta function, specifically its properties in the critical strip.
  • Familiarity with Mellin transforms and their applications in analytic number theory.
  • Knowledge of analytic continuation and its role in extending functions beyond their initial domain.
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques involving improper integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Riemann zeta function in the critical strip.
  • Explore the applications of Mellin transforms in analytic number theory.
  • Investigate analytic continuation techniques and their proofs in complex analysis.
  • Review Apostol's "Introduction to Analytic Number Theory" for deeper insights into the zeta function.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analytic number theory, and anyone interested in the properties and applications of the Riemann zeta function and Mellin transforms.

schtruklyn
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi. In Apostol's book "Introduction to analytic number theory", Teorem 3.2(b), Apostol proves

(1)
[itex] \zeta (s) = \lim\limits_{x \to \infty} \left\{ \sum\limits_{n \leq x} \frac{1}{n^s} - \frac{x^{1-s}}{1-s} \right\} [/itex]

for [itex]s[/itex] in critical strip. I know this translates to a Mellin transform integral representation

(2)
[itex] \zeta(s) \Gamma(s)= \int\limits_0^\infty \left( \frac{1}{e^t -1}-\frac{1}{t} \right) t^{s-1} \rm{d} t[/itex]

because it's stated as such by mathematician Petersen here, eq. (43). Petersen says (2) stems from the usual integral of zeta for [itex]\Re (s) > 1[/itex]

(3)
[itex] \zeta(s) \Gamma(s)=\int\limits_0^\infty \frac{ t^{s-1}}{e^t -1} \rm{d} t[/itex]

by analytic continuation, but I just can't find justification to it. It is probably trivial, but I fail to see it.

My question is:

Can someone please point me to a book-reference for Mellin transform integral representation (2), or can someone explain how one proves its validity, if proof turns trivial, possibly by use of analytic continuation or by use of (1).

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K