Hi. In Apostol's book "Introduction to analytic number theory", Teorem 3.2(b), Apostol proves(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

(1)

[itex]

\zeta (s) = \lim\limits_{x \to \infty} \left\{ \sum\limits_{n \leq x} \frac{1}{n^s} - \frac{x^{1-s}}{1-s} \right\}

[/itex]

for [itex]s[/itex] in critical strip. I know this translates to a Mellin transform integral representation

(2)

[itex]

\zeta(s) \Gamma(s)= \int\limits_0^\infty \left( \frac{1}{e^t -1}-\frac{1}{t} \right) t^{s-1} \rm{d} t

[/itex]

because it's stated as such by mathematician Petersen here, eq. (43). Petersen says (2) stems from the usual integral of zeta for [itex]\Re (s) > 1[/itex]

(3)

[itex]

\zeta(s) \Gamma(s)=\int\limits_0^\infty \frac{ t^{s-1}}{e^t -1} \rm{d} t

[/itex]

by analytic continuation, but I just cant find justification to it. It is probably trivial, but I fail to see it.

My question is:

Can someone please point me to a book-reference for Mellin transform integral representation (2), or can someone explain how one proves its validity, if proof turns trivial, possibly by use of analytic continuation or by use of (1).

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Reference or explanation of zeta mellin transform in critical strip

Loading...

Similar Threads - Reference explanation zeta | Date |
---|---|

I Truncation Errors Explanation? | May 5, 2017 |

Simple explanation of group generators | Feb 17, 2015 |

Test if 2 transformations produce equivalent relations to a reference | Oct 19, 2011 |

Linear Algebra Reference and Text | Mar 10, 2010 |

Why are certain matrices referred to as n x n? | Jul 12, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**