Where Can I Find Information on the Zeta Function over Primes?

Click For Summary
Information on the Zeta function over primes can be derived from the relationship between P(s) and the Riemann zeta function. The functional equation connects P(s) with P(1-s), and P(s) can be expressed as a summation involving the Riemann zeta function and the Möbius function. By taking the logarithm of the zeta function and expanding it, one can derive a formula for P(s) that involves sums over primes. The discussion highlights the importance of Möbius inversion in finding P(s) from the logarithm of the zeta function. This analysis is relevant for values where the real part of s is greater than 1.
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
where could i get some info about the function

\sum_{p} p^{-s}=P(s)

* the functional equation relating P(s) and P(1-s)

* the relation with Riemann zeta
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can express it as a summation over Riemann zeta's multiplied by a Möbius function. We have:

\zeta(s) = \sum_{r_{1},r_{2}\ldots}\prod_{j}p_{j}^{-sr_{j}}

where p_{j} is the jth prime and the r_{j} in the summation range from zero to infinity. Summing over the r_{j} gives:

\zeta(s)= \prod_{p}\frac{1}{1-p^{-s}}

Take the log of both sides:

\log\left[\zeta(s)\right]= -\sum_{p}\log\left(1-p^{-s}\right)

Expand the logarithm and sum over the primes p:

\log\left[\zeta(s)\right]=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{P(ks)}{k}

You can then invert this relation to find the P(s) using Möbius inversion.
 
So, you find:

P(s) = \log\left[\zeta(s)\right] - \sum_{p}\frac{\log\left[\zeta(ps)\right]}{p} + \sum_{p_{1}<p_{2}}\frac{\log\left[\zeta(p_{1}p_{2}s)\right]}{p_{1}p_{2}}- \sum_{p_{1}<p_{2}<p_{3}}\frac{\log\left[\zeta(p_{1}p_{2}p_{3}s)\right]}{p_{1}p_{2}p_{3}}+\cdots
 
I think P(s) as defined above by Count Iblis, can be written as

P(s)= \log \zeta(s)+\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{m+1}\frac{\log\zeta\Big(s\prod_{k=0}^{m}p_{n+k}\Big)}{\prod_{k=0}^{m} p_{n+k}}.<br />

I assume that's for \textnormal{Re}(s)&gt;1.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K