I just want to check my comments i made, if it makes sense before i submit
Summery statement I've made
Otto and Diesel both have practical and theory cycles whereas carnot has only theoretical cycle.
If heat engines where running the theory cycles of Otto and Diesel, there would higher...
ive written about mechanical and thermal effiency for both. the ideal engine bit and relative efficency got me. every other question specifically said mechanical and thermal efficency
Hi, i have this question and don't understand it. can somebody explain what i have to do.
i know a ideal engine is a engine running on carnot cycle
i what the cycles are
i don't know what relative efficiency is and what there looking for
(Q) Review the relative efficiency of ideal heat engines...
Evaluate 2-stroke & 4-stroke Diesel engines performance in terms of thermal & mechanical effiniecy
HAs anybody got any links. all i can find is for petrol (2-stroke and 4-stroke). Is what i got so far any good?Thermal
In a 2-stroke power stroke compared to a 4-stroke power stroke thermal...
Sorry could u layout the strokes eg 1 to 2 to 3.
Sorry for being thick.1 to 2 to 3 I take, compression stroke and ignition.
3 to 4 to 1. Power stroke, heat rejection and exhaust.
I think this is it
0 to 1 to 2 to 3 compression stroke - included intake phase, compression stroke and ignition phase.
3 to 4 to 5 to 0 power stroke - includes power stroke, heat rejection, and exhaust phase
I think this would be the sequence of 2 stroke
0 to 1 intake phase
1 to 2 compression stroke
2 to 3 ignition phase
3 to 4 expansion stroke
4 to 5 heat rejection phase
5 to 0 exhaust phase
There would just be a compression stroke and expansion stroke and the exhaust would be in included in the compression stroke and intake would be included in compression stroke?