Stoichiometry: yield of reaction between hydrochloric acid and calcium carbonate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the yield of a reaction between hydrochloric acid and calcium carbonate, where 225 g of hydrochloric acid reacts with 300 g of calcium carbonate (80% purity). The limiting reagent is identified as calcium carbonate, leading to the production of 34 L of gas at 37°C and 0.82 atm. Using the ideal gas law, the theoretical yield of CO2 is calculated to be 74.4 L, resulting in a yield of 45.6%. The mass of calcium carbonate that reacted is confirmed to be 240 g, aligning with the purity consideration. The calculations and interpretations are validated by the teacher.
pc2-brazil
Messages
198
Reaction score
3
Thank you in advance for the correction of the resolution.

Homework Statement



By reacting 225 g of hydrochloric acid with 300 g of calcium carbonate with 80% of purity, 34 L (litres) of gas were obtained, measured at 37oC and a pression of 0.82 atm. What is the yield of this reaction and what mass of calcium carbonate reacted? (Remember that H2CO3, in water, decomposes as water and CO2)

2HCl_{(aq)} + CaCO_3_{(s)} \rightarrow CaCl_2_{(s)} + H_2CO_3_{(aq)}

R = 0.082 (atm*L)/(mol*K).

Homework Equations



PV = nRT

The Attempt at a Solution



2HCl_{(aq)} + CaCO_3_{(s)} \rightarrow CaCl_2_{(s)} + H_2O_{(aq)} + CO_2_{(g)}
Molecular masses: 2 HCl = 2(36.5) = 73 g; 1CaCO3 = 100 g.
Assuming that the expression "with 80% of purity" refers to calcium carbonate (we are not sure):
The molar relation in order to know the limiting reagent (but the purity of the calcium carbonate is 80%, so 300 g * 80% = 240 g):
1 mol HCl \rightarrow 1 mol CaCO_3
73 g \rightarrow 100g
x \rightarrow 300 \times 0.8
x = 175.2 g of HCl. Smaller than the available quantity, 225 g, thus it is in excess. The limiting reagent is CaCO3.
Now, the molar relation between calcium carbonate and the gas, CO2, in order to find how many litres of the gas (y) are produced with 100% yield.
But first, to find the molar volume:
37oC = 37 + 273 = 310 K.
PV_m = nRT \rightarrow 0.82V_m = 0.082 \times 310 \rightarrow V_m = 31 L
1 mol CaCO_3 \rightarrow 1 mol CO_2
100 g \rightarrow 31L
240 g \rightarrow y
y = (31 * 240) / 100
y = 74.4 L.
What is the yield of this reaction?
Since the volume of gas produced with the current yield is 34 L, the yield (R) is:
R = \frac{34}{74.4}
R = 45.6%.
What mass of calcium carbonate reacted?
It was already calculated: 240 g.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could be the final question (about the mass of carbonate that reacted) asks how much carbonate reacted to give 34L of CO2 assuming 100% yield. It is not clear to me.
 
Borek said:
Could be the final question (about the mass of carbonate that reacted) asks how much carbonate reacted to give 34L of CO2 assuming 100% yield. It is not clear to me.

Thank you for the response.
If the calcium carbonate is the limiting reagent, then the mass that reacted is simply the quantity given in the enunciation (considering the purity), right? Unfortunately, we would have to wait until Friday to ask exactly what the teacher meant.
It is strange that CaCO3 was the limiting reagent. If it was the one in excess, then the last question would appear more appropriate, because then we would have to find how many of the CaCO3 was actually used...
Anyway, is the yield of 45,6% right?
 
We confirmed it with the teacher: 240 g is the right answer.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top