How do you determine the amplitude of a wave exhibiting simple harmonic motion?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the amplitude of a wave in simple harmonic motion on a string fixed at both ends, one must consider the tension, applied force, and length of the string. The string resonates at specific frequencies, and the amplitude at the anti-node is influenced by the intensity displacement and the amplitude of the vibrator used. Typically, the resonant frequency for such a setup is around 60 Hz, with a 20 Hz step bandwidth to the next frequency. Understanding how the force acts on the string is crucial, as it affects the overall vibration and amplitude. Proper placement of the oscillator is essential for achieving smooth motion in the string's vibrations.
BrendanC
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When a string, fixed at both ends, has a force exerted on it, how do you determine what the amplitude will be, if the tension, applied force, and length are known?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have no idea, but clear this up for me, is the string resonating on these frequencies? i think so, and if it is, the amplitud ought to diverge, am i right? I've thought about this for a while, for i needed to measure these frequencies on the lab and i wanted to know where to put the oscillator so it would all move as smooth as it could.
 
How is the force acting on the string? Is it a pulse?

If so the amplitude of the anti-node of the string is a function of the intensity displacement. In other words, if the string has a tension on it (some mass) and then you vibrate the string, the amplitude of the vibrator will determine the amplitude at the resonant frequency. In my experience that's around 60 Hz with a 20 Hz step bandwidth to the next resonant frequency.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top