Question from Boyd's Optimization Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter newphysist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Optimization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical expression from Stephen Boyd's "Convex Optimization," specifically regarding the supremum of a quadratic form constrained by a norm. The user is seeking clarification on the equality involving the supremum of u^TP_i^Tx under the constraint ||u||_2 ≤ 1, suggesting it relates to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Other participants confirm that the expression indeed follows from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, emphasizing its role in deriving the result. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these foundational concepts in optimization. Overall, the discussion aids in clarifying a specific mathematical concept from Boyd's work.
newphysist
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am reading Convex Optimization from Stephen Boyd's book on my own and I am stuck at math he mentions on Pg. 157 of his book which can be found here.

How does he write the following:

sup{uTP^{T}_{i}x | ||u||2 ≤ 1} = ||P^{T}_{i}x||2

Thanks guys
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top