What are the differences in ionization energy between potassium and calcium?

AI Thread Summary
The first ionization energy of calcium (Ca) is higher than that of potassium (K) due to Ca's greater effective nuclear charge. In contrast, K's second ionization energy is significantly larger than its first, approximately six times greater, as it involves removing an electron from a more stable configuration. The second ionization energy of Ca is lower than that of K because it removes an electron from a more excited orbital. The differences in ionization energies highlight the impact of atomic structure and electron configuration on reactivity. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing trends in ionization energy among elements.
President Mercury
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Question: The first and second ionization energies of K are 419 kJ/mol and 3052 kJ/mol, and those of Ca are 590 kJ/mol and 1145 kJ/mol, respectively. Compare their values and comment on the differeneces.

I'm thinking of two different ways of how to do this even though I think both are wrong. I was wondering if I had to take the energy of K and Ca and subtract them? OR do I just look at them and speak about how "different" they are from each other?

I don't know if I'm thinking about this question in a logical way or not? So feed back would be much appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is the second ionization energy of K so large? Think octet rule.
 
A qualitative analysis should suffice, provided that you show enough knowledge about valence electrons and ionization energies.
 
President Mercury said:
Question: The first and second ionization energies of K are 419 kJ/mol and 3052 kJ/mol, and those of Ca are 590 kJ/mol and 1145 kJ/mol, respectively. Compare their values and comment on the differeneces.

I'm thinking of two different ways of how to do this even though I think both are wrong. I was wondering if I had to take the energy of K and Ca and subtract them? OR do I just look at them and speak about how "different" they are from each other?

I don't know if I'm thinking about this question in a logical way or not? So feed back would be much appreciated. Thanks.

looks like a lab question. The Calcium reacts faster than the Potassium because more energy is removed in a period of time...
 
Last edited:
Well, first of all, the first ionization enrgy of Ca is greater than that of K because Calcium's nucleus is more effective due to an increased effective nuclear charge. Next, the second ionization energy of Calcium is less than that of K because it is removing an electron from a more excited orbital than the orbital the second electron from K is being removed from. The second ionization energy of K is also about 6x greater than its first ionization energy because it is pulling an electron from a less excited orbital with less shielding and is closer to the nucleus, wheras the second electron being removed from calcium is from the same orbital as before.
I hope that I answered your question!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top