What is the probability of a needle hitting a line on graph paper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Needle Variation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the probability of a needle hitting a line on graph paper, based on a variation of Buffon's needle problem. The calculated probability of hitting a line is 3/pi, approximately 95%, which is confirmed by multiple participants. This result indicates that pi is greater than 3 and suggests that the needle is likely to hit a line, providing a close approximation of pi. A simulation was conducted, dropping a needle 10 million times, yielding a value of pi around 3.14067, though it was noted that this method does not converge quickly. Overall, the conversation highlights the relationship between geometric probability and the approximation of pi.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
In the "buffons needle" riddle you have a paper with horizontal lines in it all 1 unit apart and you drop a needle 1 unit long - you have to calculate the chance that the needle will hit a line. but i remembered the riddle wrong so instead i tried to solve the same question with both horizontal and vertical lines (graph paper). all of the cells are 1X1 unit. i got that the chance of hitting a line is:
3/pi which is about 95%
is that right?
Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I get the same answer. Also, note the result proves pi>3, and since it's obviously pretty likely the needle will hit a line, it shows pi is pretty close to 3. Maybe you can get other approximations for pi using a similar method, which is ironic considering the point of the original problem was to empirically approximate pi.
 
Last edited:
I wrote a program that simulates a needle falling 10000000 times and counts the times that it hits a line. using that i got that
3/pi = 0.95521 or pi = 3.14067 - ok but i guess that this method of calculating pi doesn't converge very fast.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top