Are Volcanic Emissions Really Greater Than Man-Made Greenhouse Gases?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from volcanic eruptions versus those produced by human activities since the industrial revolution. It is clarified that volcanic emissions of CO2 are significantly lower, estimated at approximately 1% of anthropogenic emissions. While some argue that volcanic activity can release more greenhouse gases during intense eruptions, the consensus is that over a year, human emissions far exceed those from volcanoes. The conversation also touches on the role of volcanic aerosols, which can cool the Earth by increasing its albedo. Claims that volcanoes emit more CO2 than human activities are labeled as common denialist arguments that have been debunked. Overall, the debate highlights the importance of understanding the sources and impacts of greenhouse gases in the context of global warming, emphasizing that historical volcanic emissions do not influence current climate change dynamics.
OSalcido
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
is it true that there are more greenhouse gasses released from a single Volcanic eruption than all of the gasses produced by man since the industrial revolution?

If so, shouldn't that silence the global-warming advocates?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
No, hence, no.
 
Any references would be appreciated
 
Probably not from a single eruption, but combined volcanoes do pump out more greenhouse gases than people. Umm, i can't really talk about global warming and atmosphere stuff cos it's not really my thing. But I believe that volcanoes pump out sulphate aerosoles, these things cool the Earth down - I guess they increase the planet's albedo.
 
OSalcido said:
Any references would be appreciated

Volcanic emissions of CO2 are approximately 1% that of anthropogenic emissions.

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/programmes/landres/segs/downloads/VolcanicContributions.pdf

That is another common denialist talking point that has been thoroughy debunked years ago.
 
Skyhunter said:
Volcanic emissions of CO2 are approximately 1% that of anthropogenic emissions.

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/programmes/landres/segs/downloads/VolcanicContributions.pdf

That is another common denialist talking point that has been thoroughy debunked years ago.

And that's a strawman. There is no serious debate about the origine of the CO2. The volcangenetic CO2 is completely irrelevant. The essential problem with a strong GHG effect is the triple falsification of the positive feedback idea which is the key mechanism to catastrophic global warming.
 
The recent "Global Warming Swindle" documentary for example made the claim that volcanoes emit more CO2 than man, and I have had plenty of arguments with people claiming that there is debate about the origin of the co2. Clearly it's not a strawman to say that it's a common argument used by skeptics.
 
true lies and half truth

over total history I think the volcano's win
as they have been around a lot longer then man
but billions or even millions of years ago old CO2
is long gone and plays no part in the current events

but over a given year no
maybe higher at peak in a real intence event
for a short period of time?
data sure is being SPUN
by both sides
 
  • #10
ray b said:
true lies and half truth

over total history I think the volcano's win
as they have been around a lot longer then man
but billions or even millions of years ago old CO2
is long gone and plays no part in the current events

but over a given year no
maybe higher at peak in a real intence event
for a short period of time?
data sure is being SPUN
by both sides

Of course there will be false arguments from some individuals on both sides, but the wholesale falsification of data is overwhelmingly on one side. Answers to most "skeptic" arguments are well known and can be found here, among many other places.
http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics

There's a much more wordy description of skeptic arguments here; it's a year old but doubt about AGW has only decreased since it was written. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR2006052301305_pf.html
 

Similar threads

Back
Top