Constant water drop rate (via diffusion)?

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks to create a simple device for consistent water droplet release from a bucket, initially considering a cloth for diffusion. However, responses clarify that the method relies on capillarity rather than diffusion, and the droplet rate will vary based on water height. For a more reliable solution, a tight container with a pipe and stopper is suggested to maintain constant pressure, allowing for a steady drip rate. The discussion also touches on the feasibility of using a capillary clock, noting that various factors like viscosity and evaporation can affect accuracy. Overall, achieving a constant water drop rate requires careful design and consideration of environmental variables.
leoflc
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need to make a simple and cheap device that I can water droplet at a constant rate (from a bucket of water).
The size of the droplet doesn't matter, it just needs to be dropping at a constant rate (at least for a day).

So I was thinking, can I achieve that by putting half of a cloth in the bucket, and the other half on the outside of the bucket. By doing that, the water should be sucked out of water because of diffusion, and the outside half of the cloth will be dropping water droplet at a constant rate.

Will this work?
Is ther any other way I can make a device that can drop water droplet at a constant rate (at least for a day)?
Is is there data out there that can help me with the diffusion rate for certain type of material?

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can work, but this has nothing to do with diffusion. It is just capillarity that "sucks" the water and prime de siphon. But the rate will not be really constant. It will depend on the difference of height between the surface of the water in the bucket and the extremity of the rope (better than a cloth).
If you need a really constant rate, you must use a trick. Take a tight container (a big one) and a stopper. Put a pipe trough the stopper and adjust the pipe in order that its low opening is almost at the bottom of the water. Insert the rope through the pipe. It must not be tight. Air must pass freely between the rope and the inner wall of the pipe.
As the water is sucked, the level in the pipe will descent until it arrives at the lower extremity of the pipe. Then air bubbles will enter the container as the water is slowly sucked.
Now the distance which determines the drops rate is the height between the bottom of the pipe and the lower extremity of the rope.
 
lpfr said:
If you need a really constant rate, you must use a trick.
Basically idea is to have a vessel with constant fluid level (hence constant pressure despite that the reservoir empties).

lpfr's idea is equivalent to using the base of a bird-feeder as that vessel.

Another version (I think I got this one from Hero of Alexandria) is to have a large reservoir drip into a smaller container (quickly, so that the smaller container is constantly overflowing, and let the overflow be discarded down some other hose). Now, since the pressure (ie. level) in the smaller container remains constant, a tap at its bottom will drip at a constant rate.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the helps!
I don't really need the rate to be that consistence, just need to be accurate enough for a day.
I was thinking about suing the capillarity idea to make a water clock.
 
lpfr said:
It can work, but this has nothing to do with diffusion. It is just capillarity that "sucks" the water and prime de siphon. But the rate will not be really constant. It will depend on the difference of height between the surface of the water in the bucket and the extremity of the rope (better than a cloth).
If you need a really constant rate, you must use a trick. Take a tight container (a big one) and a stopper. Put a pipe trough the stopper and adjust the pipe in order that its low opening is almost at the bottom of the water. Insert the rope through the pipe. It must not be tight. Air must pass freely between the rope and the inner wall of the pipe.
As the water is sucked, the level in the pipe will descent until it arrives at the lower extremity of the pipe. Then air bubbles will enter the container as the water is slowly sucked.
Now the distance which determines the drops rate is the height between the bottom of the pipe and the lower extremity of the rope.

Thanks a lot for the tip.
But I'm not so sure what is the stopper, can I get that from places like homedepot?
Thanks a lot!
 
leoflc said:
Thanks a lot for the tip.
But I'm not so sure what is the stopper, can I get that from places like homedepot?
Thanks a lot!
The stopper is just the cap of the container or the cork of a bottle. It is what renders the container thigh. It comes with the container.

You can do a capillary clock, it can work. You can even consider entering the records book with the most imprecise clock in the world. The reason is that drop rate and drop size depend on viscosity of the water, surface tension of the water and evaporation rate. All this depend on the temperature. The evaporation rate depends also on air humidity and air circulation.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top