Is Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics a Good Resource for Self-Study?

AI Thread Summary
Classical Electrodynamics by J.D. Jackson is a widely used textbook, but opinions on its effectiveness vary. Many students have studied from it, with some recalling positive experiences while others have had difficulties. The consensus is that it is not suitable for self-study, particularly for those just beginning their studies in electromagnetism. The text is considered more appropriate for graduate-level courses, as it compresses undergraduate concepts and often omits detailed explanations, leading students to seek additional resources for clarification. The discussion also highlights that the user has access to a collection of physics books from a late relative, suggesting the possibility of finding more suitable study materials.
ziad1985
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
The short version:I'm taking Classical electrodynamics this semester, I found out that I have this book:
Classical Electrodynamics by J.D.Jackson
Anyone know this book?Would it be a good choice to help me study?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, many folks have studied from this text... some with fond memories.. others, not so fond.
 
It's one of those texts that can be either good or bad, but you're probably stuck with it since it's so widely used.

From my experience with the text, I can safely say that it's not made for self-study. You will find yourself often looking to outside resources for clarification on certain derivations/concepts that Jackson omits. Also, some of the problems are very difficult (but that's what this forum is for, right? :biggrin:)
 
I'm not really stuck with it, I just have it...
It's not for self study, Like I said I just started taking the courses and saw that I have this Book..
My late uncle was a science book collector, in his library there is a few thousand books raging from biology to particle physics(I don't know why he collected them)anyway they are all mine(stuff related to physics), I'll see if I find other books on the same subject..
 
Last edited:
here's a list:
 
ziad1985 said:
I'm not really stuck with it, I just have it...
It's not for self study, Like I said I just started taking the courses and saw that I have this Book..
My late uncle was a science book collector, in his library there is a few thousand books raging from biology to particle physics(I don't know why he collected them)anyway they are all mine(stuff related to physics), I'll see if I find other books on the same subject..

Er.. if you are just starting to learn E&M, that book is not something you want to use. All the stuff you learn in undergraduate electrostatics is compressed into Jackson's Introduction! So it is not a good book to start learning E&M from. Jackson's book tends to be used in graduate level E&M courses.

Zz.
 
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
50
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top